Chapter Eight – US Domestic Surveillance and the Murder of Irah Sok

 

Now we will do something a little different. We will show how this ability to detect surveillance using the Google car can be used to assess the nature of events which you see in the news.

On my news site, somebody posted a video about a case where the ATF seized a guy’s guns wrongly. The guy wanted some gun part, likely some kind of custom AR buffer tube. So he went to a local machinist, the machinist insisted on putting it in his trunk, he relented, and the moment he opened his trunk, he was swarmed, and ATF seized the guns in his trunk of his car.

Something didn’t sit right with me about the ATF agent emphasizing over and over, that he had just been in the wrong place at the wrong time, and it was all bad luck. It had a “doth protest too much” quality. And the machinist insisting on putting the part in his trunk where his guns were, rather than just handing the small item to him, also felt off. They all knew what was in that guy’s trunk. And the way they would know that was, he was under surveillance. And then ATF would not return his guns, even though he was cleared of all wrongdoing, and even the ATF agents said it was a big misunderstanding. It felt like a set up. And yet, if he was under surveillance, they knew he was innocent going in, and no crime would be found. It appeared surveillance set him up specifically to take his guns. But why?

The piece mentioned that as he was undergoing what felt like a manufactured turmoil with ATF, his sister was murdered. That felt off to me. Too coincidental. Knowing how US domestic intelligence and the American Stasi work, I wondered if it was possible the events had been orchestrated to disarm him and tie him up legally during the time when his sister was murdered for some reason. That would imply his sister was some sort of target.

If she was a target, she would have been under surveillance, so I decided to do an investigation and analysis of the surveillance infrastructure surrounding his sister, the beautiful wife and mother, Irah Sok, using the Google car in Google streetview. As you will see, the results were intriguing.

Irah Sok was, by all accounts, a well-loved pillar of the community. She was a devoted mother, with a thriving photography business, which did quite high quality work.

A word on photography. As I have tracked down some of the surveillance assigned to me in my investigations, I have found a number have set up professional photography side-hustles.

The civilian component of the domestic surveillance in the United States exists almost as a secret society. Parents raise their children in it, and there is even a small sleep-away camp held at what appeared a hotel/dormitory in Florida, which you will find the kids often post photos of on social media, while they are attending it. In the background of the photos will be men in wraparound sunglasses with blue and white ID placards which appear to have FBI logos on them.

Most of the secret society members today are raised as domestic surveillance from the time they are children, even being utilized in genuine intelligence operations in the schools. There, they are run against other children as assets, as the adult domestic intelligence agents giving them orders use them to probe and assess the other kids – the next generation of citizen. At that age, children are too young to defend themselves, and too naive to hide who they are and what they are capable of. In some cases, where a student appears on course to one day be a problem for the conspiracy, the adults may try to intervene through the provision of pornography, or alcohol, or drugs, using their child spies to introduce the obstacle and derail the potentially problematic kids.

By the time they are adults, these domestic intel operators will have considerable training. One specialty they will eventually be trained up in is photography. As domestic surveillance, they will also tend to have first-rate photography equipment on hand, so forming a side-hustle as a professional photographer is a natural fit for them. It is a cover identity, a source of additional income, and a way to perfect a skill the conspiracy needs.

However as a result, any regular, non-surveillance citizen who forms a successful photography business will be draining away business from other photography businesses which are very likely being run by domestic surveillance personnel. Those citizen spies will have at their disposal a considerable range of assets to deploy to get that business back. I have no idea if a jealous domestics spook took Irah out to increase their own photography business’ success, but it would not surprise me. By the end of this chapter, you will see she clearly angered someone.

To begin, we will cruise by Irah Sok’s photo studio. Here is the shopping center it is located in, circa February 2022:

Oddly enough in a series of photos taken in February of 2022 according to Google, in Washington State, months before the shooting, where it is so cold there is salt on the cars due to icing, right in front of her photo studio is what looks like a surveillance vehicle with the driver’s window open, despite the temperature:

I have noted how keeping windows open to observe sound is a common procedure you will notice with surveillance vehicles. Out of about 75 cars, both parked and driving there, only one, parked right in front of her studio, has an open window.

You will notice his tailpipe producing copious condensate:

So the car was cold, on an overcast winter day, either early or late because her sign’s lights are on, yet he has his window open to the outside, and he has been running the engine for a while, probably to power his heater. But he is not driving anywhere. I would have pulled out and taken off long before I dropped that much condensate on the ground.

Domestic surveillance appears to park different cars around in different parking lots, I assume for when they are shorthanded on drivers, so the drivers can swap cars mid-follow and increase and vary their number of vehicular “silhouettes.” During my own early shock and awe phase, as they flooded cars by me one after another in an attempt to intimidate me, I saw the same driver go by in two different cars in a mall parking lot away from a residential area, during cold weather. The second car was blowing steam out of the exhaust pipe since it had just been started and was cold. I assumed they drove by in their car, then headed to a nearby lot in the mall where another car was parked, started it up, and cruised by me again to make me think there were all these cars, each with a different driver.

Also note in the photo below, as you drive past him, his other passenger side window is very open:

So on the side which the Google car was coming from, where it would have a direct sightline into his car, the window was open, but less open, as if he closed it a bit as he saw the Google car approaching to be less obvious. On the far side, where he would be at the Google car’s 4 or 5 o’clock after it passed, and the Google car would probably not be looking back, he opened it much more.

Notice also, it gives the driver a better sightline to the Google car when it is directly behind him, through that passenger-side, rear-view mirror. You can almost see the driver in the mirror in the picture above. All on an overcast winter day, in early morning or toward evening, in a cold car.

So if you continue driving, another pickup, driven by a woman, just happens to drive between you and Irah’s studio, just as you pass it, perfectly timed:

That could be a coincidence, but it is curious, as I have done these analyses in a lot of lots, and do not see cars often doing that, let alone, just as I pass a potential target business I am suspicious of. As I have said, they seem to pride themselves on timing things like that, as well.

Also curious, this yellow Chevy pickup truck picked up and pulled out of her parking spot and passed you as you entered the parking lot, and made her way to the exit, as you can see below, where first she is pulling out in front of you, and then behind you she is driving to the exit, which is right to her left in the photo, as you continue to drive:

Behind you:

Now the strange thing. You don’t see that pickup again, until it came time to exit the parking lot, presumably in a few minutes, when it showed back up to lead you out of the lot:

Plus, although people buy bright yellow cars, I think surveillance actually has some reason why they buy brightly colored cars, perhaps to be more noticeable during harassment operations.

Where I am, bright yellow, and a neon-puke-green are very common among their vehicles. And of course bright red is so noticed by those harassed, it was included in the famous meme by a 4Chan “Targeted Individual” who is under this. The meme made fun of the surveillance people, which in the Targeted Individual community, are referred to as “Gangstalkers”:

Regardless, continue around the back of the shopping center, just to see what you will see, and you happen on these guys:

I classify them unremarkable, though I note, this guy has nothing in his hands:

As you continue to drive past drive past them, you will note, he brings his hand up to cover his mouth:

It is always possible he is just a nail biter, or he coughed. However foot surveillance utilizes communications gear which features microphones taped to their chest. When they want to send out a communication, they will hit a microphone key, often in a pocket, and speak into their chest while covering their mouth, so it is not obvious they are talking. I have seen foot surveillance do everything from vape, to pick their nose, to fake-cough, to itch their nose, to hide the fact their lips are moving and they are sending a message through their chest mic. If his other hand were in his pants pocket, like on a button-key for the mic, I would say there was a 95% chance he was foot surveillance.

As you continue around the back of the store, the other two pedestrians take the corner and continue to observe you:

I know what the American Stasi looks like. I have been looking at it for decades. Even if only some of that were coverage, that is a lot of coverage around Irah Sok’s shop.

As you will soon see, had Mrs Sok been surveillance aware, she might be alive today.

Next, we will travel to the murder scene, and see whether there is anything which could be consistent with surveillance activity around Irah Sok’s house, here:

We will start near the back of the cul de sac, at the end of the dead end street Irah Sok lives on, shown by the arrow below. We will drive down, and then take the curve and continue to the right. The timeline of photos was taken as the Google car exited the cul de sac, and the photos were taken in August of 2018:

The Google car was exiting the street, traveling from left to right on the map above, heading to the main street.

Here is what you see. The arrow below is pointing at the back window of a car parked by the side of the road, which will pick up and lead the google car out of the neighborhood, just as the Google car reaches the corner:

His pickup was perfectly timed to the Google car approaching the corner and coming into sight. He is using a “cheating command” position, where instead of following a target, you drive in front of them.

It is possible it is a resident who just happened to start driving away the very moment the Google car happened to come into view, but again, the precise timing is highly coincidental. The way you spot surveillance (which tries to appear normal) is repeated statistically coincidental occurrences that correlate to your movement. You cannot look at surveillance and see it – it is designed to look normal. You can only see the repeated coincidences of unusual occurrences, which build as time goes on.

You would only see this kind of surveillance in a neighborhood of high importance to the surveillance. If there were not an active surveillance target in here, they would simply let you enter, post on the entrance, and pick you up when you left.

They do not like you seeing their cars, and little cul de sacs like this cannot have a mobile vehicular unit follow you or monitor you without you seeing it. They needed eyes on the Google car for this spot because one of these houses is under active surveillance. There is something in here they are interested in.

Here are a few of the shots of the car leading you out as you exit. These photos were taken in August of 2018, according to Google. As you are driving in these shots, Irah Sok’s home, where she was murdered, is just to your left. So the surveillance car had parked by the side of the road before it, picks you up, and maintains you, “sighted,” as you pass her home on your way out:

Now something serendipitous happens for our statistical analysis. We will change timelines again, mid-street, from August of 2018, to a newer timeline of photos which were taken in February of 2022, six months before the murder. When I do these pieces for my website, I frequently get these chance occurrences of good luck. Now we get to drive this street a second time, four years later, in the middle of the day, when everyone should be at work, and see if there was a car in here the second time too, which could have been watching us. This adds to our ability to judge the statistically anomalous nature of activity on this street.

Seeing one set of eyes in an isolated cul de sac once, and having it move when you move is statistically unlikely, but not definitive. But if every time you are in this street, there is a car there, that is the kind of statistical anomaly which points to surveillance. Especially a small cul de sac, in the middle of the day, without many houses on it or many people living in it. So let’s visit this street in 2022, six months before Mrs Sok’s murder, and see if there will happen to be another set of eyes which just happen to be there as we are driving by:

Yes, we have a postal service truck, parked, in the middle of somebody’s driveway, and not by a mailbox. For many first time readers of these pieces, the significance of the fact it is a postal truck will elude them. In several previous pieces, we have noted US Postal Service mail trucks in areas where people were apparently high-priority targets. We see them so often, we have come to call them the Postal Service Truck of DeathTM.

There were the people who were being harassed by their local surveillance, whose dog was skinned and left dead in their yard. In an analysis of their neighborhood coverage, surveillance was noted all around their house, including a Postal Service truck parked right outside their driveway as the Google car passed, seen here:

To show that what we call a Postal Service Truck of Death is in fact intelligence related activity, there was the case of a former NSA covert listening post which was listed on a real estate website after the government decommissioned it. It was a covert listening post established in a residential neighborhood to look like a home. But inside it was a warehouse for a data center, complete with lockers where agents would have to check their weapons. When a real estate youtube channel did a Google driveby on Streetview, prominent in front of the building was, yet another example of the Postal Service Truck of DeathTM running surveillance overwatch:

And as in the previous case where we saw a US Postal Service Truck of DeathTM staking out the entrance to the house of a (doggie) murder victim, The truck outside Irah Sok’s house is parked exactly opposite the front door of the murder location.

Exactly across the street from this new Postal Service Truck of DeathTM is the address listed for the husband of Irah Sok. You can see the house number over the garage, and then pan 180 degrees to the opposite side of the street.

The reason he chose that particular spot is her front door was recessed, behind the front line of residences there. As a result, he had to be right there to have eyes on her front door. Any farther up the street and it would be blocked from view by the front of the house next door, any farther down the street, and it would be blocked by the garage next to the walkway. Go to this link, and swing back and forth by dragging your mouse while holding down the left button, and look at how perfectly he is positioned to watch that door. It is creepy, knowing just a few months later, she was murdered in front of her family in the living room of that home.

So six months before Irah Sok is murdered, you drive down her street, and they have a Postal Service truck posted exactly opposite her front door, sitting with its lights on, not near any mailbox, in the only spot with a sightline to her front door. And he will remain there as long as you are on the street. And if you drive past her wedding photography business, there is another surveillance vehicle posted directly in front of her wedding photography business, with the windows open, six months before her murder. And her brother is jammed up by ATF in a bogus intel op, which puts him on ice and takes his guns, just before she is murdered.

Had he not been jammed up by ATF and had his guns taken, is it possible she could have called him, saying she saw something which scared her, and asked him to stay with her? Might he have smoked the assailants right after they came through the front door? We will never know, because ATF put him on ice while she was killed.

After many years of observation, it is my opinion the USPS may actually be a covert domestic surveillance/intelligence agency. I strongly suspect the entire agency is an intel honeypot designed to trick you into handing them physical copies of interesting intelligence materials which you do not feel safe sending digitally or over the phone, with a promise your physical copy will never be opened, examined, or cataloged, because that would be against the law. I suspect within the organization is a cell of intelligence agents whose sole purpose is locating and reading those communications. And they probably, in loose fashion, utilize the closeness of the postal workers with their community to try and tease out additional intelligence about all of us, for our files.

Our valiant Postal Service employee will sit there the entire time you are driving the street in this timeline. You will see him arrive, and park, just seconds before you approach this spot, later in the piece.

Someone speculated these may not be real Postal Service vehicles, and surveillance has bought a bunch of these, and simply pulls them out of their storage facility whenever they want to sit outside a tier one target’s house as the Google car passes.

While I can say I have seen a fake Fed Ex truck and a fake Police SUV, I do not know if this is or is not fake, nor do I think you can tell. I do know my local surveillance operation has taken over the Post Office in my town, even setting up a perimeter of foot surveillance loitering all around the building, securing it. So it would not surprise me if it is a real employee in a real truck.

On the other hand there is a man named Richard Bruce who posts conspiracy videos on youtube based around Reptilian theory. Reptilian theory hypothesizes that a species of dinosaur evolved to be technologically sophisticated, and survived the meteor impact which killed the rest of the dinosaurs. It hypothesizes that today, they are hundreds of millions of years more advanced than we are, they rule the world, and they are sort of farming humans for some reason, be it slave labor or an experiment. He uploaded videos to youtube to that effect, and immediately came under hostile harassment by the domestic Stasi in America in LA.

He could have uncovered a non-human conspiracy, or he might have just been noticed by his neighborhood watchers, who decided it would be fun to screw with him. Either way, his videos show he is clearly experiencing harassment.

He posted a video of an LA Police Department helicopter flying in circles over him. A helicopter buff in the comments linked out to the LA Police Department’s aviation site which listed their aircraft inventory, identified the model circling him in the video, and showed the Department did not have that model of helicopter in their fleet. He wrote:

L.A.P.D. operates a fleet of 17 helicopters, 12 are Eurocopter AS350’s, 4 are Bell 206 Jet Rangers, and the 17th is a recently acquired Bell 412. The paint scheme has been recently changed to a black and white motif that is consistent throughout the fleet. These choppers [Ed note – The helicopters in the video] all have the basic shape of the classic Huey. Some of those things flying over you are ringers, in my opinion.

If correct, the local Stasi bought a Huey-type helicopter and painted it in LA Police Department markings, and was flying it around LA harassing random people. I do not care which innocent fellow countryman is being harassed in my nation, nor do I care what he believes. Everyone of these is a crime which cries out for justice. Of all the nations in the world, the United States, most of all, should place a premium on protecting the weak, and not abusing them, simply because you can get away with it.

In my own life, my neighborhood crew bought a police light bar, and was running different cars back and forth in front of my house with the light bar running on top of them and a siren on the cars. They even ran it on a Tesla, before moving it to a white civilian Dodge Durango. A few days later, they added an undersized door decal for the local Police department to the Durango and Police markings. Apparently they did not have an A3 sized printer to print a large door decal the same size as the local department, so they used a regular A4 printer to print the logo on 8×10 sticker paper.

Returning to the story of Irah Sok, the postal truck could certainly be fake. There is no way to tell.

As you look to your left, you have your cable/fiber truck and two people out on their front yard across the street. These photos were taken just months before her murder:

As always, there is no knowing with certainty whether that is surveillance or not, though it is worth noting it is another corner house on the intersection of a high priority target’s street. I put the chances of the mail truck being surveillance at 99.99999% based on my experience, given there is somebody in it just sitting there opposite the target residence for so long, in so many photos, with no mailbox nearby. I’d say the same for the fiber truck, if there were a guy sitting in it, not doing anything. Drive up and take a look:

Sitting in the driver’s seat, there is a guy not doing anything, maybe on the phone, watching that intersection in his side rear-view mirror (a surveillance technique to minimize the exposure of the operative to the target, compared to parking facing the intersection, where the target sees through the big open windshield that there is someone in the truck, awkwardly looking at them.).

Interestingly, as the Google car exited the street and began this turn, if you look back, the Postal Service Truck of DeathTM decided to turn his wheels and begin to pull away from the curb:

As you will see in a moment, he parked there, just before you entered the street. You drove in, to the end of the cul de sac, turned around, drove out, and the entire time he sat just in that spot, directly in front of Irah Sok’s door, without leaving his truck, and now as you leave, he pulls away from the curb, and begins to drive off.

Surveillance detection depends on the observation of suspicious coincidences in timing that correlate with your movement. What are the chances of his movements correlating to your’s that closely? What are the chances that you see all this activity on this street corner, and all of it is innocent, and coincidental? That Postal Service Truck of DeathTM is close surveillance, running overwatch on a future murder victim’s house. These waters in the US are running deeper than you would think.

You also have a couple of walkers at your 6 o’clock, but it is much more difficult to tell if they are surveillance. If they are, Mrs Sok was a high-priority target for some reason:

It turns out probably two to three minutes before the above photos in another timeline, we were approaching the target intersection behind us, going north, and just as we reached it, the walkers reached the corner, so based on the perfect timing, I would increase the likelihood they were surveillance:

If at every intersection you come to, every corner you hit, somebody is there, timed perfectly to your arrival, you have surveillance. It is the most basic rule. Surveillance needs people at that decision point to call which way you go, and the corner where Irah Sok’s street met the main drag, was a critical decision point.

They were timed to post on that corner just as we hit it, and then return to moving. It looks weird, but again, you see it often enough you begin to just accept, this is how it works in America, where somebody has recreated the East German Stasi, and an astonishing number of Americans turned out to have the same selfish mindset and lack of principles of the East Germans who spied for the communist government back then. There are a lot more of them out there than I would ever have thought possible.

I have the advantage of having undergone the shock and awe phase of an overt harassment campaign, during which both of these women would have glared at me as they held their wrists to their mouths, and talked into them while pinching their cuffs to try and look threatening. If you see that enough over a period of a year or two, at every corner you come to, it is a little clearer what this is. You see the astonishing magnitude of the size of the operation, and you are better able to accept something like this could exist.

In that timeline of photo-taking, the Google car turned right at this corner, heading east on this (technically still the target’s) street away from the target’s residence.

It is interesting to continue down this cul de sac on the other side of the intersection, because you have no eyes on you there, once you are out of view of the intersection. Similar street, technically the same street as the target’s, but no cars on it. No residents in yards, no walkers, no Postal Service Truck of DeathTM, nobody. That is normal for a cul de sac in the middle of the day. What you saw above is not normal, nor was it unrelated to Mrs Sok’s murder.

The Google car came out of this street, and crossed over to the target’s street heading toward the target residence. Google combined these timelines, mixing and alternating the photos as you drive toward the intersection. So near the intersection, you will shift to your exit from this street, before crossing the intersection and heading to the target’s house, generating the photos we saw in the beginning.

As a result, at the entrance to this cul de sac you get a few photos of the Postal Service Truck of DeathTM you saw before, just before you crossed the intersection to pass in front of Irah’s house. So when we turn on this street, we see what we would have seen right before we encountered the mail truck. The mail truck was driving, and was about to pull over and stop, just seconds before we entered the street and passed the truck. Undoubtedly somebody radioed into his earpiece at that moment that the target was coming, and he needed to post up and wait outside the target house.

Here he is, driving toward his final posted position, in front of the house of Irah Sok, just as we are about to cross the main drag and then drive the street in front of her house:

All the time you drive there, and he never exits his truck, or does anything but just sit opposite that house. There may be cameras on the mail truck, and they are watching from the command center or the nearby neighborhood observation post as you drive by him. Or he was Facebook Live-ing you with his phone and command was watching. Or maybe he was just vocally relaying what you were doing. But that was close surveillance

The corner is interesting in other ways. Across the street on the side of Irah Sok’s house, there is a dark SUV pulling out of the driveway. He was not there when you entered this street. In the time it took you to drive to the end of this street and find your way back to this intersection, he has pulled quickly into the driveway, perhaps to drop someone off to man an observation post inside, and now he is about to pull out. Except he doesn’t really pull out.

 When you first see him across the street, the Postal Service Truck of Death is parking, and the dark SUV is pulled more into the driveway, but not fully in to park:

Then he begins to pull out. You will notice the wheel has just begun to enter the drainage gutter as you pass him:

But he does not pull out. You drive down Irah Sok’s street and are well past the mail truck, and if you look back, he is still sitting behind the car parked on the street, and he is not continuing to exit.

Once you get to the back of this street, he exits out of your sight, and you will not see him when you leave.

As I have said, surveillance tends to preferentially purchase houses on street corners, and move its people into them to better cover those decision points. Given this car pulled in here for 30 seconds and would not finish leaving until you were out of sight, and this is a corner house on the street of a high priority target, I would judge it a decent probability this house is domestic surveillance, as is the owner, and it was being used as an observation and/or monitoring post as you drove the street

Of course, as you approached the intersection, just as when you were exiting the dirt road in Bulgaria, you have two cars which passed each other exactly in front of your intersection, with no cars in front of them or behind them. Could be innocent, but it seems there was not much traffic, since those were the only two cars. So that which was there, was perfectly timed in a way surveillance will tend to do, so they can lead you in either direction should you go that way:

To your right, the two homeowners of the house with a sightline to the intersection there are outside doing gardening work, and you have the fiber guy who sits in his truck with his elbow propped up against the window not doing anything:

It is a lot of potential surveillance activity for one corner, especially since you just came from a side street with nothing happening on it in the middle of the day while everyone is at work.

Again, you don’t need to just look at the photos above. Click over to Google Streetview, and take the drive yourself, and look around, as if you are in the car yourself. It is better training for the apocalypse than the time you spend at the range. The most dangerous enemy you will face going forward in America is the American domestic surveillance machine, and here you can see their operation prepping an intelligence package which would be given to a hitter they brought in and used to execute the murder of an innocent American citizen. Learn to see it. It could save your life.

If we continue east on the cul de sac across the intersection from the target, heading away from the target residence, but looking back toward it, we enter the earlier time frame. There, we have just turned on this street, and the walkers have just begun to cross the target’s street after we turned. We see that in that timeline, they also had a truck that was driving out from the target location, just as we would have entered that street, had we turned left (west) to drive to the target residence when we were at the intersection.

Had we entered the street instead of turning away from it, that truck would probably have taken up the position of the Postal Service Truck of DeathTM, but now it sits at the intersection across from the walkers and watches us as we drive away from the target residence.

How often per day do you think that intersection has cars there? So far, you have never seen it without one watching her house or the approach to it:

Exit this cul de sac and head north of Irah Sok’s street, and you have a little stubby road off to the right. As you approach, a vehicle hits it, and you still have the cable truck behind you:

You also have this dogwalker coming around the corner of the next intersection ahead on the left, but she is a bit hesitant to turn the corner I think, because she has been told to post across from the street, and she is hoping you won’t notice her now, so when you see her later, it will be the first time.

 

Notice her toe is right next to her heel, which is not really a mid-gait position, and is more like you want to look like you are walking, but not really advance. Even her light brown dog is barely walking:

When you exit, she is right across the street, seemingly picking up her dog’s stool:

It is possible she is legit. Or she could be faking picking up stool just at this moment, so her face is obscured and the target would think she has a reason to be there that is not related to him. If she didn’t seem to be pausing in the first shot, and she wasn’t hitting the corner just as you hit this corner, I would be ambivalent.

The problem with surveillance is, it is taught to look like it belongs. “Cover for status,” and “Cover for action.” In surveillance parlance, that is “why would someone like you belong there?” And belonging there, “what are you actively doing which explains why you are there that moment, and does not involve watching someone?” She is a resident of the neighborhood. But it is not enough to just be a resident standing there looking around for no reason. You want to be doing something like walking a dog, or gardening, or getting mail, so you blend in completely.

Interestingly, if you look behind you now as you head north, you will notice as you were driving the cul de sac street, a white sedan appears to have been paralleling you on the target street opposite you, and when you turned out of this cul de sac, it popped out of the empty street you drove opposite the target’s residence, and continued straight across the intersection, back toward the original target residence. You can see it just over the rise in the road:

Imagine how many cars Irah Sok had driving back and forth all around her house all the time on that little dead end street if there was this much traffic on the street just in the few minutes the Google car was here.

And now you have another car which will arrive at the next street up, just as you arrive at it, as well as a walker just about to walk up the street:

Of course you turn up the next street, and in your last view of the dog walker, she hasn’t really moved. She’s still at the edge of that grass patch just standing there. She could be letting her dogs sniff, although they are not really sniffing, and seem on pause too. None of this is 100%, but it is curious, especially since there’s nothing where she’s looking, but you’re in the corner of her eye:

Now, as you turn left into this new side street ahead, and you lose the girl with the dogs behind that corner, you have another walker who will have a sightline to you as you drive, in the guy who just turned the corner:

What I am going to do here is post a picture of the walker with the Google car next to him, splice in the overhead map showing where the Google car and the walker are on the street on an overhead view.

Then we are going to drive, and see how far the walker moves, compared to the Google car. Here is the walker next to the Google car:

Now we will drive, and look back, and see how far they get. He will manage to walk to just past the nose of this pickup which you can just make out on the upper left in the picture above. So under him on the right, I will put the overhead map of when the Google car was there to mark his position, and on the left will be the Google car’s position when the photo was taken:

According to Google’s map, you traveled about 750 feet, starting from a slow turn speed. The walker has traveled 20 feet. I would say the Google car sped through here, but he could not because all along the street are these speed-bump speed limits, which I would assume he nearly obeyed, since he has the camera ball on top of the car, and there is a bump and you cannot avoid it. A picture of the Google car’s camera in a reflection, and the signs:

If the Google car did, say 20 mph, then the walker did 1/37.5th of that, or .53 mph. The spread of “average walking” paces is 2.5mph on the slow side to 4 mph on the fast side. So your walker is walking 1/5th the lower bound of average speed and one eighth the higher bound of “average” speed – as he is trying to get somewhere. Or he is just surveillance, loitering near the corner.

I can continue to do these, showing that as you hit intersections, there will always be watchers at the corner to call your direction of travel. Here at the next intersection north, another cable/fiber truck has pulled off in front of an empty lot, and is again using the sideview mirror trick:

It is possible the extensive surveillance in the area is unrelated to the murder, though clearly Irah’s house was a focal point given the mail truck, as was her business. I have no doubt somebody was at least listening in her house, as she was killed, and they know exactly who did it. And I am sure the local PD at some level knows the surveillance is out there, and I will bet they whisper about the weird things they see on the job among themselves, and wonder what was up with this. Her murder is still unsolved as of this publication, over a year and a half later.

Why the surveillance is there is the mystery. A home invasion, in that neighborhood, resulting in a mother shot in the face in front of her young son, is not something which would be on my radar looking at the neighborhood. Clearly with all the walkers, people are not hiding in their homes in fear. The place looks delightful. It is hard to think it was entirely random.

And I should add, all this Google imagery predates the murder. So the surveillance did not show up after she was killed. It was there before she was murdered. And we will show this is not the only such case.

I tend to rule out the idea she was a criminal, this was law enforcement surveillance, and she was just killed by fellow criminals as surveillance stood by. She does not look the part, and if surveillance was unrelated, and she got hit by some fellow criminals, and the surveillance was normal law enforcement, how has the crime not been solved? A gang of men who murdered a beautiful young mother, in front of her child, by shooting her in the head? Even if she was a criminal, regular law enforcement would have parallel constructed a case by now, and wrapped these killers up. What you are looking at is not FBI, or local PD. It is the American Stasi, and I am pretty sure it is killing innocent people.

As I have long said, what I have seen has to have allowed 9/11 to happen, assuming 9/11 was not an actual operation run by the command of this thing to acquire increased surveillance powers – which is entirely possible. There is no way this massive an operation, watching the nation, sector by sector, with this level of granular detail, did not take a close look at all of the hijackers when they moved into somebody’s sector, and figure out exactly what they were up to.

Aristocrat and former girlfriend of Prince Andrew, Lady Victoria Hervey, said that Jeffrey Epstein and his friends not only knew the 9/11 attacks were going to happen in the months leading up to them, they purchased tickets on the doomed planes as mementos. Of course Epstein was an arm of the pedophile blackmail wing of the American Stasi, and I have shown in other work it appeared at least one of the young girls he abused was guided to him by the American Stasi, working as operational support.

I am not exaggerating when I say this operation is a hostile, criminal, foreign-intelligence operation, which views the average patriotic American as the enemy. It is embedded like you see here, all throughout your neighborhood, and its children are operational as intelligence agents, working under adult intelligence officers, targeting your children in the schools. I have spent the last decade, being overtaken by sobering realization after sobering realization. I did not conclude all this easily or lightly.

It is interesting Irah Sok was physically beautiful. I assume in some areas, there are voyeurs in the local surveillance operation who would have nothing better to do with their time than set up on a girl like her, to watch her and her husband in intimate moments on video filmed on cameras planted in their bedroom while they were out at work. When your observation post next door can see and hear in all the houses nearby, and you have full vehicular surveillance overwatch, it is no big deal to enter a house and plant any devices you want. You are not going to get caught. In that regard, this is exactly like the Stasi. They cannot be “caught.”

Nothing would surprise me with this thing. In fact I would be surprised if anyone has not had their privacy invaded by this operation, given it’s scale, its embedding in every neighborhood, and the way things really work among the powerful. It is not like anyone would believe it possible if you told them. There is a near-zero risk of exposure or consequence, even if someone goes around telling people. Our societies are run by psychopaths and the sexually deviant.

It is also possible a local surveillance operator with a side photog gig simply saw a petite Filipino immigrant, who had no power, and was in the way of their photography side-hustle, and they wanted to take her out to eliminate the competition. Then somebody looking things over pulled her brother’s file, saw he was a vet who rolled with an arsenal out of a John Wick movie in the trunk of his car “just in case,” (which I would bet he got trained up on, with bucks like that invested in it). And then they saw he just retired from the military, and they worried he might just decide to come to town to do a little digging into who killed his little sister, and figure out what happened himself, since he has nothing else on his plate.

Having the local cell in his neighborhood set him up, and then call ATF in (probably just telling them he was some sort of problem, without any further detail), to disarm him and keep him unbalanced, is not at all impossible in the rule-less, law-less world of the United States domestic intelligence service that is the American Stasi. In fact, it is exactly how intelligence would operate.

That the conspiracy disarmed and disabled him, and then took her out is ominous, if you stop for a moment and think about it. If they were related, and I suspect they were, that is a lot of planning and a lot of prep, and a lot of moving pieces, just to kill one pretty little Filipino girl. I keep wondering, what else she could have happened upon, in her life.

I know, this all sounds nuts. Fifteen years ago this would have all sounded like the ramblings of a schizophrenic to me, until I got into politics, “they” showed up in my life, they went out of their way for a few years to try and intimidate with the scale of their domestic forces, and then I began getting vibrated in the middle of the night by one of their electronic harassment machines, waking me up in my bed.

Pretty quickly, I realized this thing is real, and it has simply hidden itself from us very well – and for very good reason. When America finds out about it, it will be a war which this thing may not survive.

All of this is coming out. It has gotten too big to remain concealed. You can see it right here on Streetview. You will see subsequently, this does not appear to be the only case where the American Stasi murdered innocent young women. And when it does break out into a broader awareness, there will be no containing the fallout.

Up next, Physical Surveillance on the Idaho College Coed Murder Victims.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *