So you want to know if someone is following you. Real surveillance detection has an artistic aspect. You can’t learn it just from reading a book or a website. The real art is a secret skill, kept almost entirely secret from regular people, save for what you are about to read. However even after reading this text, you will still need to spend some time practicing it, before your mind will develop an almost psychic intuition regarding what belongs in the environment around you, and what is just pretending to belong.
Even worse, most texts are so incorrect in their assertions they are almost disinformation. As an example, if you purchase a text on the subject of surveillance detection, you are most often told detection revolves around the principles of TEDD, which stands for Time, Environment, Distance, and Demeanor.
You watch everyone around you, and look for the same people, or cars, or other facets of the environment reappearing over different areas, some time (T) apart, in different environments (E) or some distance apart (D), as you scan for people which exhibit unusual demeanors (D). Time, Environment, Distance, Demeanor – TEDD.
As an extreme example, stop by the gun store, and then visit the local office for Handgun Control Inc. 100 miles away three days later, and if you see the exact same guy, getting out of the same car, in both places, looking awkward and nervous, you can assume he is following you. That would be a different Time, and different Environment (right-wing vs left-wing), a sizable Distance, and a suspicious Demeanor.
That form of detection works best for targets who expect to be followed by individuals or small teams, where the opposing force (OpFor) cannot rotate large numbers of faces or vehicles around you. If you are a terrorist or a drug kingpin, facing an underfunded DEA team, maybe it works well.
But those who run this world run an operation far bigger than you could imagine, a civilian informant network at least as big as the Stasi, and maybe bigger. They can follow you all day, to hundreds of places, over hundreds of miles, letting you see their operatives thousands of times, and not show you the same faces or cars twice.
It is a massive force combining seasoned and trained surveillance officers, and lower level civilian informants/surveillance who have signed on to follow their orders. If you have surveillance problems with the American Stasi, TEDD is of little use.
If you want to detect Stasi surveillance, you have to look for subtle movements around you which betray controlled and practiced maneuvers designed to help a large operation make sure it sees everything you do and everyone you contact.
They will be performed by an unrecognizable array of different people and vehicles, but the patterns of movement will be the same, and will eventually start to jump out at you.
This is more of an art form. Those who have not developed it will tend to not see the indices that become apparent to you when you have developed it. It is almost like going from being colorblind to seeing in color, and after a time the ability becomes a vision of the world you can’t unsee.
If you want to develop the ability, you have to be put under surveillance, and see it firsthand. Surveillance operators try to hide, and appear as if just normal people passing through your space, so spotting them can be difficult. It is made even more difficult by the fact that these will all be different people, since the network that they have amassed is so massive.
If you are reading this you are probably under this surveillance right now. As part of its monitoring of the population, it has identified free thinkers and individualists, and it targets them in every community, keeping a watchful eye on them. They will view you as a tier one threat, since you would not want to live under their shadow dictatorship, if you saw it. All that is keeping you from seeing it are the ingrained biases instilled by your societal programming, which tell you this could never happen in America – and anyone who thinks it could is ipso facto mentally ill and someone to be shunned by society.
I’ve spent a lot of time thinking about this, because one of the things I think will free our society is if I can train people to recognize the surveillance around them. The surveillance is the most visible part of the domestic Stasi’s operations, and its biggest Achilles’ heel. If everyone sees it, if everyone understands how it is operating against them, a groundswell can be built to destroy this machine.
But to do that I knew I would need a way to have everyone have the experience of being put under surveillance, while knowing they have been put under surveillance, so when they see the indices, they know they are real. Once conditioned to see them here, they will see them in their own neighborhoods, and the US domestic surveillance wing of the American Stasi will no longer be able to advance in the nation unopposed.
What we are going to do is take a spin around the world on Google Streetview. There, you are going to see what surveillance looks like, firsthand, with your own eyes, as real life covert surveillance people follow you in the Google car, executing all the techniques of advanced surveillance.
We will begin in Russia, where we’ll run an actual counter-surveillance detection route, in real life, customized to exaggerate the differences in patterns of activity around you that you will see while under surveillance. You will be looking at real spies, doing real spy stuff to you. And you will never leave the seat you are sitting in right now. When you finish, you will have the training and experience which previously was only available to top-tier operators who had been lucky enough to get the most demanding espionage assignments in hostile nations. Most importantly, you will not only become a capable operator yourself, you will see how utterly helpless you are right now, and how incapable you were of protecting freedom in America.
Before we begin, some basics on surveillance detection. Surveillance detection is a game of recognizing probabilities. You don’t get 100 percent certainty in the business of detection. You will rarely be lucky enough to be able to say, “There is a definite surveillance operative, now I know I am under coverage!” It does not work that way.
Surveillance tries to look like normal people going about their day, so you cannot look at an operator, and be sure that they are part of a team tailing you.
So what you do when you begin learning detection, is you perform actions, which if there were no surveillance, would likely result in you being alone. Now somebody may show up by chance at that moment. But you are playing probabilities. So you do it again. Maybe somebody else shows up by chance again. But if you do it ten times, and you should have been alone each time, and you were not, you can begin to conclude that the probability dictates, you are being followed.
So you won’t know with 100 percent certainty whether each person you see in the following courses is a spy following you. Many surveillance operators will look like normal people going about their business while operating, because that is what they are trained to do.
But you will know you are under real-life surveillance coverage, with real-life covert surveillance operators, because it is the Google car operating in hostile territory. And that will produce enough weirdness for you to get an idea of what real life, first-rate coverage will look like. Most importantly, it will show you how probabilities build up as time goes on, and the repeated small-probability observations indicative of likely surveillance coverage begin to amass into an overall conclusion that you have surveillance.
As you do this, you may begin to feel what surveillance people look like. There is a quality many of them have, kind of like distracted, kind of under tension, kind of faking interest in anything but you, kind of like even though technically they could belong, they do not. I actually had a German Shepherd who could feel when surveillance people were trying to look, while pretending to look away.
I had played a game with him from when he was a puppy, where I would pretend to ignore him as I inched closer, trying to steal his tennis ball. He would wait and laugh at me, sometimes even barking and lunging, to make me jump as I inched closer looking at the clouds, ignoring him. When my surveillance began, he doubtless saw our game in the weirdos popping up all over, and he would bark at them. Never normal people, just the surveillance people trying to look, while faking their interest elsewhere.
With practice, you will learn to feel them too.
After your first run through Russia, we will do it again through Bulgaria, and again, and more after that, eventually bringing the lessons home to America. What you will notice is the same weirdness repeats, because surveillance follows procedures and develops shortcuts, and these tend to be the same wherever it operates.
So you will see the same events again and again, under the same circumstances. Operators show up at specific critical moments in your travel, they take specific positions, to minimize their exposure and gain an optimal sightline to you, and then they are not present at other junctures in your travels which surveillance does not typically concern itself with. It develops a feel. You will realize they would want to know what you are about to do, you will expect one, and there one will be, waiting for you to make your decision, and you will feel a sense of disingenuousness radiating off him.
Of course, once you process this information, you will be really dangerous. We see preppers online try to make people capable of surviving the Apocalypse by making them “dangerous” in various ways. We see tactical websites talk about the bright, shiny pieces of being dangerous, like weapons choices, tactics, fortifications, improvised explosives, defensive hand to hand techniques, knife fighting, security procedures, and so on.
I was enthralled by, and studied most of it in my youth. There are hacks to make your car more bullet resistant, or scientific tests of the best weapons sights for use with night-vision.
Firearms especially are undergoing a renaissance of technological sophistication with thermal imaging red-dots at budget price points, and a plethora of brands of infra-red lasersights, only visible through night vision devices. As of this writing a video is circulating showing the latest thermal riflescope, which produces so detailed an image you can identify a coyote at 500 yards out in pitch blackness, solely off the thermal emissions of its body heat, with zero ambient light, and place a bullet accurately enough to take it down.
Night vision using traditional intensifier tubes to see in minimal light are being blended with thermal imaging into dual-spectrum binocular devices, allowing one to see in the dark while enemy forces show up as brightly lit bodies of heat on the image, no matter how camouflaged they are, or how dark it is. Surveillance cameras and security systems are also advancing similarly.
There are endless threads on the benefits of different bullet brands, and how to be self-sufficient in everything from medicine to metalworking as everything falls apart. I will tell you, when you are talking about really surviving in a hostile environment, all of that is only 5% of being dangerous, if even.
Because the real battles are won before they are fought, and before you ever get the chance to use any of that pretty, shiny, attention-grabbing stuff.
Those battles are won before they are fought with intelligence operations. And intelligence operations may begin with database dumps and chair-borne research, but the meat and potatoes is actual, physical surveillance of the target, from vehicular and foot, to electronic monitoring, to infiltration. Being able to see surveillance, will make you untouchable on a whole new level, against the most professional enemies you will face.
You will see it treated as common knowledge, from a CIA assault on a foreign terrorist safehouse, to an Al Qaida terrorist attack. They will all perform detailed surveillance of the target, before doing anything. That surveillance is the weak point, where their operation is most vulnerable to exposure, and it can then be prepared for.
Has anyone performed detailed surveillance on you? Would it give your leaders a power over you, if they had, and they knew what guns you owned, where in your house you hide your gold, or that your son has been known to keep some weed, an illegal narcotic, in your home? Is the United States government so responsible with your money, and its leaders so moral and committed to freedom they would not have sought that advantage? Do you trust the powers running the United States government to look at the power the Stasi gave the East German government, and not seek to gain that power for themselves?
I almost wonder if the government is out there promoting debates on the utility of a subcompact .22LR pistol vs a 25 ACP, or pushing the AK-47 vs AR-15 comparison in an apocalypse scenario. If you were not discussing those comparatively meaningless survival/defense topics on your own, have no doubt the government would have agents out there promoting those conversations to keep you from studying intelligence/surveillance – the one subject which would make you truly dangerous – and the one subject which if understood, would actually promote freedom as much as, if not more than, the Second Amendment has historically.
Because a good intelligence operation, by winning the war before it is fought, without the victims even aware there was a battle, makes the Second Amendment’s ability to help an oppressed population fight an overbearing government utterly useless. And believe me, they are running a very good intelligence/surveillance operation out there on all of us as you are reading this. The Second Amendment is at this moment, useless to resist this machine, given nobody even knows it exists, or has intervened in their lives, or the lives of their children. Indeed, as a nation we are armed to the teeth, and yet we are all helpless as we watch our beautiful nation torn apart and destroyed. And we know it is purposeful. But we cannot figure out how to stop it. That is the power of intelligence, and it begins with surveillance.
Reveal the surveillance, and we will begin on the path to reclaiming our nation and rescuing her.
Now one final word of caution before we begin. You will likely see surveillance in your actual real life if you begin practicing this. I estimate the Secret Society of informers, which those who rule over us have recruited within the US, comprises between 4% and 10% of the population, at least. It could be even bigger than that.
That was the size which a tentative pilot program for such an operation, called Operation TIPS, envisioned. Operation Tips was created after 9/11, and by most media accounts was going to create a network of civilian informers for the government which would have been as large as that run by the East German Stasi, just as a pilot program. When word broke of it in the media, Congress made it expressly illegal, and it was supposed to be dismantled.
My assumption was it already existed prior to the formation of the program, and the program was an attempt to make it fully legal, to cover the collective asses of everyone involved.
Obviously a program exactly like it, only much larger now, continues to exist, so I assume they just continued it as it was, prior to the outrage – deep in the shadows, as a dangerous secret which they all pray every night will never be revealed.
So if this is past the pilot phase of Operation Tips, and is reaching maturity as I suspect, it is not impossible we are approaching 10% of the population operating as junior surveillance G-men, available for surveillance or harassment duties for whatever organization is really running things in the US.
Undoubtedly it focuses coverage on those who are awakened, on the left and right, whether they are active in BLM, or Antifa, or the Tea Party, or the NRA, or are just generally aware of the corruption of the system. Just you knowing this material will make you interesting to them if they find out you are aware – because it will make you a little dangerous yourself, in that you could help reveal the secret.
If you get coverage, I cannot tell you what the real life risks are long term, if they find out you know about them. I am still figuring that out myself.
It would obviously be best if they did not know you know about them. If you practice this detection skill in real life, and see your surveillance, as the kids say, hide your power level, and try to not let them know that you know. You will pose the biggest threat, in their eyes, once they realize you know.
Notice, but don’t notice, and never think you can tell anyone about it or talk about it, whether in the car, or even in the deepest recesses of your house. The remote eavesdropping technologies they issue everyone, are to die for. They listen in moving vehicles all the time, and the neighborhood monitors are listening all throughout everyone’s houses. It is my belief they tune their devices to each person’s house, and run each of those feeds into an interface which makes listening in houses in the neighborhood kind of like switching between radio stations on their computer. And they will have a monitor on duty 24/7 whose entire job is to switch around, looking for anything interesting.
They are listening everywhere – especially where you think they never could, and where you would utter your deepest, darkest secrets. They know to focus there most of all, where you think they are least likely to listen, since the best secrets will be there.
So if you notice it, make it your secret which never leaves your lips, and enjoy noticing it without showing any external sign you noticed it. Enjoy fooling them. It is easier said than done, because when the shock hits of how big this thing is, and that it is targeting you, your brain will explode.
So if you see it, put on a pokerface and act as if you notice nothing, and know, if they are there, you cannot tell anyone around you anything, because they will hear it, and you cannot let them see, that you see them.
OK, now a little on Google Streetview, the virtual reality 3D world that Google constructed from actual pictures, taken by a Google car with a giant camera ball on it, which takes pictures in all directions as it drives on roads. In Street View, you can go on your computer to any road it has mapped, and turn around in any direction, even looking straight up, from any point, and look around as if you were there. You will see what the Google car’s cameras saw at the moment it was there, in that spot.
Did you ever wonder, what would it cost to actually drive almost every street in the world, with a 3D 360 degree camera ball, snapping 50 pictures per second, and then upload all of them to servers all over the world over a satellite uplink as you drive? Did you wonder what it would cost, to take all of those pictures, and assemble them, using a database program that could actually organize all of it into a 3D model, and deliver it over the internet to anyone who wanted it, at a rate of a hundred thousand users simultaneously at a time? Do you know how much the bandwidth costs to run a small, primarily text-based website? What do you think imagery-based Streetview costs Google?
What does just the bandwidth cost? What is the cost of the computing power to create that virtual 3D world? What is the cost of maintaining servers with enough memory capacity to store multiple photos from almost any point, on any road, in the world? Let alone the cars and drivers and electricity, and camera balls, and so on. Did Google do that just for us to cruise the streets and make fun of people we find captured in the images, on Reddit?
Suppose, just for the sake of argument, Google Streetview wasn’t some altruistic pie in the sky effort by a bunch of geeks to waste hundreds of millions of dollars and “share knowledge with the world.” Suppose Google Streetview was a CIA operation, designed as a cover story, to produce a 3D map of the globe, for operational purposes, so CIA could better run snatch and grabs, and dead drops, and meetups and so on, by allowing operatives to see where they would be operating, before they got on scene?
Suppose you have to get something from beside a bridge in Moscow. Imagine if you could actually rehearse your approach, using a computer model composed of actual pictures of the area, and see where you would be most exposed, and where you would have the most cover. Imagine you could see exactly where the package would be hidden, where surveillance might hide to catch you, where you might be ambushed after retrieving it.
Wouldn’t it be great to have a 3D virtual reality world you could enter, and see the place before you ever went there?
There is one problem. Vladimir Putin isn’t going to let CIA run a giant camera ball all over his country, so they can more effectively operate against him.
But Google can go there. If you ever use Google Streetview around sensitive sites in the US, you notice more often than not the interesting stuff gets the old 2007, overexposed, low-res treatment. Not so in Russia, or China. So if Google Streetview is a CIA op, it would make sense foreign powers would treat it with hostility.
Imagine in Russia, a US company car, in their homeland, with a giant ball camera, two feet in diameter, three feet up in the air over the car on a pole, with fifty cameras on it pointed in all directions, and hundreds of wires zip-tied and run into the car, recording fifty different shots in all directions.
That is a huge red flag which any foreign intelligence agency is going to want to keep an eye on.
For all they know, an enemy may have hacked the feed, and paid off the driver to take it by sensitive government facilities as an intelligence gathering tool in preparation for an attack. It might not even be a real Google car, but rather be a spoofed car from a foreign agency sent in to look like a Google car and surveil something.
So any foreign intelligence service is going to follow it just to keep an eye on it, document where it goes, and exactly what it sees. They can’t just leave that be, especially in a foreign country that is not on good terms with the United States.
Moreover, the Google car is a good choice for our purposes because while they need to keep an eye on it, it is probably not a tier-one threat that will run counter-surveillance detection routes and try to uncover them, and be ultra surveillance-aware. So the following team is not going to break out their “A” game when following it, like they would with a trained spy. They’ll be around, they’ll be in shots, but they won’t be in ultra-stealth mode like they would following an elite CIA officer meeting his best source.
Now, how do you run a counter-surveillance detection route, to spot if those spooks are following you, and you have “grown a tail,” as the spies say?
The answer is simple. You head somewhere where you should not see people, and then see if you end up seeing people. If you unexpectedly go in an empty store, early in the morning when nobody should be in it, and right after you enter, three people walk in and spread out in the store, the chances are good you have company. If they behave unusually, like trying to keep you from seeing their faces, so they can continue to follow you in the future without you recognizing them, you have even more indicators. If you repeat that fifty times, and never manage to tour a store alone, and the people keep behaving unusually, you can get to a point where you will be pretty sure you have a hidden entourage.
So here, we are going to drive around and look for people following us or looking at us in places where we shouldn’t see too many people, and we will look for things they do that are unusual. It is limited, as Google tends to stay on roads. It would be nice to walk a park or duck down an alley, but we will find some spots.
And so we are ready to begin. Here, we will take a little flight over Russia, and look for a nice area, rural, without apartments (which will increase foot traffic and dilute the surveillance signal with lots of regular people walking around). It should have winding roads that will curtail long sightlines so they will have to have people either follow you in a car closely to keep an “eye” on you at all times, or pass you in the oncoming lane frequently, or take to foot and loiter as you pass by to keep an “eye” on you as you go out of view. We do not want long straight roads, where one car, a mile back and almost out of sight, can watch you through binoculars.
For the same reason, we don’t want a massive flat area where one guy can park in a parking lot in the center, and watch you travel the entire route. You need terrain to hide you, and bring them in close. And we will look for roads that should not have a lot of traffic in the middle of the day because they only serve a smallish number of houses or industrial operations. They also need to not be good for traveling from one heavily populated place to another as a shortcut.
Basically we want to reduce the normal population level so the surveillance signal stands out more and is easier to see, while making sure the area is difficult to surveil without sending in large numbers of people, all to maximize that surveillance signal.
All along the way we will keep an eye out for strange behaviors, loitering, and people that appear stationed at intersections (“commit units” that call the path you take at “decision points,” like intersections, so the team which is staying in a “floating box” just out of your sight can rush around the margins, out of your sight to get ahead of you and keep you in “the box,” without you seeing them do so).
It’s going to be fun. You will be blown away.
Basically, we will cruise around and see how often we enjoy a little bit of solitude, and how often our solitude is interrupted by an “innocent” citizen or car just happening by innocently, just as we are about to decide to go left or right or straight, and then we will scrutinize the interloper to see why you should give them a second glance when performing surveillance detection.
We will begin this journey in Russia because we need a place where Americans will assume there is hostile surveillance. Since Russia gets demonized so much, and Americans would assume a Google car would get surveillance because of the “hostile” relationship, it will be our first choice.
I actually came upon this method of training, cruising around Russia, looking at what it would be like to relocate there, to get away from my own local American Stasi teams and their tender, directed energy ministrations of the night.
When cruising around on Google Street View, you can click the transparent arrows on the screen to move in the direction you are pointing (and the farther away you click, the farther you jump), or you can press the up and down arrow keys to move one step in the direction you are pointing (up arrow), or move backwards away from what you are looking at (down arrow). That is good for looking back behind you as you drive forward by pointing behind you, and hitting the down key to head in the opposite direction, as if driving while looking back. You can swing with the right and left arrow, or for more efficiency, drag the screen side to side with your mouse by clicking a point and holding the click as you drag the image. And don’t forget you can zoom in by clicking the plus and minus arrows on the lower right of the screen. We will also include the images here though, so no need to run to the computer just yet. You can do this all, while just looking here.
So where to begin? Let’s try here. This is a small road through a sparsely populated residential neighborhood in Russia. An overhead of the path we will take is below, with our entry and exit located at the bottom of the path, where this neighborhood street opens onto a main drag:
It is an isolated neighborhood, the roads are not really good shortcuts connecting two heavily trafficked areas so the only traffic should come from the houses there, and at midday, things should probably be running slow. Notice Google coverage with Streetview is a little spotty, but there is a nice little loop over on the right, highlighted above in yellow. Lets take that and see if we notice anything. This is Google’s August 2012 record of the footage there. Google periodically updates footage with newer pictures. So if it does, you can click “more dates” in the little window in the upper left, and select the date above to take exactly this tour.
If you want, take the drive here, and pretend you are an innocent tourist, just looking around, and do not look for anything strange. Scan from side to side, and take in the details. Examine how everything appears as exactly what you would expect. Now lets look at the trip while being surveillance aware.
A quick word on how vehicular surveillance will operate today. As you drive, it will be disbursed around you in what used to be called a floating box when surveillance was done by small, specially-deployed teams, and all that stood between you and losing your team was one thin layer of coverage around you. Back then maybe six cars tried to get in front of you and behind you, with other cars paralleling you on side streets, and when you turned, the box would turn, off the radio call from the commit unit that was in sight of you.
As the box turned with you, it kept cars all around you on side streets, just out of view, except for the one car on the street in front of you, and the one way back, ideally out of sight. The weakness of the box was you could lose your team if you could make it through the single layer of vehicles.
Today surveillance has exploded and been permanently stationed everywhere, on street corners and near points of interest, and in roving vehicles constantly driving all around. What you see is now more akin to a giant cloud of mist all over your town or city, with a smaller denser cloud which forms around targets like you as they travel.
That smaller, denser cloud of followers is assembled on the fly from a force that is more like a hidden undercover Police force embedded all over, and stationed in sectors to provide what is called phased coverage.
In phased coverage, each area has several vehicular, foot, bicycle, and posted units loitering around within it. They wait to be called on, to follow someone when they enter the sector. Then they hand the target off to the next group operating in the next sector as the target exits their sector. When not following someone, they cruise around and keep their eyes open for anything interesting to report to their controller. All of this has been organized very much like a Police force spreads out it patrolling cruisers. The American domestic surveillance machine’s following brigade is very much just a covert agency deploying watchers on foot and drivers cruising around, all over its various areas of operations.
It would appear as US domestic surveillance has grown, it has far exceeded the original size and mandate of the Operation TIPS network of citizen informants, many of whom appear to have an app on their phone which calls them into action and gives them directions when they are in the vicinity of a target. I have been walking in Costco myself, and actually seen a picture of myself, taken in the clothes I was wearing, within the previous hour or so, on the screen of a phone held by a watcher who was looking for me in the wrong direction as I walked up behind her.
Regardless, when you are on the lookout for it, understand that surveillance doesn’t get in your rearview mirror and follow you around. It drives in front of you and leads you. It parallels you on side streets according to the directions of a car watching you from a parking lot as you pass. It gets to where you are going before you, and parks with its hood up as if it is having engine trouble when you arrive.
Now lets begin the drive. The entrance to the neighborhood will look like this:
You enter the neighborhood, staying right:
Since I have published this, Google has deleted several specific images from this drive, however we have saved the images and will reprint them here.
When you pulled in a few minutes earlier in the first link, you would have seen the woman pictured below, with her baby carriage, standing off in the street to the left as you passed:
If they delete that image, you will have to take my word the images were genuine, and the woman was there.
I am not surprised after my publishing these pieces, which were quie popular, online at the time, someone has been scrubbing the Google database. This information is the most dangerous information in the world. The fact you have a secret society, modeled on the East German Stasi, in your neighborhood right now, striving to control your life path from the shadows, using the tools of an intelligence agency to even target your children in the schools, using their own children as agents, subverting your Constitutional republic, is the big secret which could set off a real revolution – and create real freedom.
If you become surveillance aware, as I am teaching you to be, and if you help our society become surveillance aware, that is the biggest single threat faced by the powers that be. It is not surprising they would seek to limit the access to this information.
As you continue on, you will stay to the right, and follow a counter-clockwise loop, coming back to the main road behind you. You will then take a left onto the main road you just got off, and stop for gas at the next gas station off to the right. That will keep the google car’s timeline as consistent as possible. If you go left as you enter, you will be following the path the Google car drove, but you will be looking at the pictures in backwards order compared to how the Google car took them, as it originally went right when it took these series of images.
So, returning to our entrance, when we pull off the road, to the left we have a woman on foot, watching us, with a baby carriage, and she is totally focused on the baby as you approach, before turning to look at you after you pass:
Clearly she has a carriage, and isn’t looking at you, so she couldn’t be surveillance. Unless she was surveillance and the carriage is the cover she uses when she runs foot coverage. I would ask, why is she not pushing the carriage, and in motion? I assume she was posted there, and had to remain in place, one of two redundant elements which would call your entrance into the neighborhood to the team already positioned in it.
In reality we will later discuss why this neighborhood may house something more than just houses. It is possible she is a sort of lookout, for a more serious security team housed here. But for now, we will examine her, and then move on.
Note, surveillance does not stand alone, with nothing in their hands, looking out of place and staring at you. That is not how they are trained. The truth is, that woman is actually what they are trained to look like when on a job.
Now she could be innocent. Or she could have jumped out of a leading vehicular unit a minute before, grabbed and unfolded a carriage, and stood there. Nothing says there is definitely a baby in the carriage, though in my experience surveillance will bring children, and even babies, on follows to enhance their covers.
Remember you are looking for consistent unusual activity near intersections as you pass them, which could be consistent with “commit units” calling your direction of travel to a bigger team. Notice how she is not walking, she is just standing there, looking at her baby. If you saw me with a carriage there, I would be actively moving it more often than I would be standing around next to it, as the carriage is a conveyance. As a car suddenly turned off, it would trigger me, and I would reflexively glance at it, just to assess it. How long does she stand there looking at her baby each day? Where is she coming from, and where is she going to? How many houses are there in this neighborhood? How often is somebody there at that juncture, not moving, just as a car passes, in the middle of the day?
Ask yourself what the statistics are that you have a pedestrian at that turn off, just as you turn off. It can be a small probability and still be innocent, but if it is a small probability and it happens all the time, again and again, it may not be innocent.
For now, do not assume she is surveillance. Simply remember the pedestrian-at-the-intersection theme. You will see it again throughout this book. What will happen over time, is you will note, over and over again, you will enter neighborhoods and come to intersections in areas which are remote, where you would not expect to see a pedestrian, and one will be there, over and over.
Over time, with repetition, you will realize surveillance places an asset at “decision points,” so they can radio the team, apprising them that the target has traveled in “X” direction, and the team needs to make the adjustment. Once you make that realization, you will come back to this picture, and that innocent woman will look entirely different to you, and you may find a drive through your own neighborhood and town will as well.
Since this is the first event we have seen, we will call it a low-probability event. However it is an event consistent with surveillance. So you register it, as well as the fact she turns to look at you only after concealment has come between you and her:
Google deleted that image as well, but not to worry, we kept the screenshots. I would ask, if it is not significant, and this work is not important, why would Google delete just those photos? You do not see that anywhere else on Streetview.
I will conclude by pointing out, if she is a foot operator then one car may be missing a navigator. Official government surveillance vehicles usually feature a driver, and an operator who does double duty as navigator, plotting paths as the driver drives, for maximal efficiency, and who is trained to jump out and run foot surveillance where needed. So a car with a missing navigator could be of interest. We also just happen to have a car that just happened to pull off right ahead of us, at that moment:
Not dispositive, but on that side of the development, you are looking at about fifty houses which that car might be heading to. In the middle of the day while everyone is out working, how many cars head to houses there per hour? Three? Five? One? Ask yourself how many cars you will see during your drive through.
What are the chances that the very two-second window when you pull off onto that road, the one car that will pull off that hour would pull off right ahead of you, just in that two second window? Exactly in front of you? It seems out of fifty times pulling into that development, you might expect maybe once or twice, a car might jump off right ahead of you. Maybe.
It is a smaller probability event, unless you were under surveillance, where a surveillance vehicle, leading a target, is considered a preferable technique to the more obvious follow from behind. In surveillance parlance, the technique of leading a target is called, taking a “cheating command position,” and it is a well-established, commonly used technique to maintain eyes on a target in a rear-view mirror, while concealing the surveillance driver’s face more effectively, and appearing to not be a following vehicle.
Notice also how as you drive down the road, initially he is way ahead of you, but as you approach the decision point, you catch up to him. If he is surveillance, he is doubling as a “commit unit” for that second intersection, to let the team know which fork you are about to take. If he was surveillance, he would go slow to see which fork you took, as he tries to stay as far ahead of you as he could, without blocking his sightline, so you don’t get too good a look at him.
He does exactly that, so that would normally be a higher likelihood surveillance-related event. Of course since this is the Google car, he almost certainly is surveillance. In fact I would have bet you would have seen exactly this, with a stationary unit at the entrance and another unit at the first turn. But if this were you instead of Google, although not dispositive, it is curious, and would put you on alert.
As we continue, we will take the right fork, as that is the path the google car took, so it will maintain a consistent timeline of photos in chronological order, instead of traveling backwards in time as you take the trip.
Were this me performing this route in a neighborhood like this in America, there is not a lot off that main road, so I would have expected them to get one or two cars or so off into this neighborhood ahead of me, just in case I decided to go in. Once I went in, they would have sped to a spot in the neighborhood where they could call my path, and get an idea what I was doing, and they would have then tried to act natural.
If they knew ahead of time I was heading into this neighborhood, then I would expect several units prepositioned in there, including foot units, as I went in.
Although professional surveillance cars will often have two people, with a driver and a navigator (who doubles as foot surveillance, being dropped off as needed, and then picked up after), informants from the civilian informant network, who pad out the force in the US, appear to ride solo, or however they normally would, such as with their children, or other family.
My impression from driving around Russia, on Google Streetview, is that ironically, Russia does not have an extensive civilian informant network of citizens spying on their fellow citizens for the government, preferring instead a smaller force of professional government surveillance workers.
When I travel to poor areas in Russia, the surveillance vehicles I see will be brand new sedans, probably brought in from Moscow, in contrast to the run down and rusted out cars you will see in driveways. When I make similar trips in America, even in the most-rural and remote Alaskan woods, as you will see later, the cars following you will be the same beat up, rusted-out cars from the community – in one case, even being seen later parked in the informant’s driveway.
I know it goes against current narratives. However my assumption is the media and the narrative-crafters in America are so hostile to Russia because this Stasi-like intelligence operation, which appears to have as its ultimate command structure, a foreign, non-state group of ultra-wealthy globalist elites, has somehow been kept out of Russia, which as a result has far fewer citizen informants, and far less surveillance. And that makes Russia an enemy of the true, hidden hand which runs the West.
So going into this Russian neighborhood now, I would expect professional government surveillance with two people per car. Which means one on foot alone, such as the woman who was dropped off with the baby carriage, and another person near or in a car. It is always possible they could be shorthanded or have informants helping out, or some sort of team leader might roll alone, but usually I would expect there would be a duo.
Now in the US, I would assume five of these houses in this neighborhood would be surveillance observation posts, owned, and lived in, by citizen informants, and with operators inside watching their neighborhood. As a rule of thumb, one in twenty to one in ten houses will tend to be associated with surveillance somehow in the US, and in some neighborhoods, it is much more. I am not exaggerating, or being hyperbolic. In the US, the network is that large and intrusive.
Also, there is so much coverage in the US, and it is so much about control (and when needed intimidation), that they will use even more vehicles than you will see here, added to those large numbers of covert observation posts hidden in homes, making it even more obvious than you will see here.
Returning to our trip, take the right fork, to begin driving the loop which will curve around to bring you right back to the entrance. Drive it with an eye to scrutinizing anyone you see for any unusual signs they might be surveillance. Also, examine the houses for tech wired in, or people loitering (Spoiler – little observation post activity was seen, so all you will see is foot and vehicular – another sign Russia has more privacy than America, and a government which is less hostile towards its people).
We don’t see much, until we make the first turn and see this black sedan parked in a driveway off to the left. It contains a guy, who is sitting half in the car with the door open, not doing anything or moving as we pass. He appears to just be watching a turnoff onto a dirt road 150 yards ahead:
This is pretty obvious. First, look at him. No hands on the wheel, he is not advancing his position. He is just sitting there with his hands in his lap watching the Google car. This guy backed in probably a couple of minutes ago. If you drive all the way down the road, and look back, he is still sitting there, not moving, with his car door open.
Despite it being a nice car, he has no air conditioning, possibly because he has an alternator that is supersized for powering various tech in the car, he has a second alternator stuck where the compressor for an AC would go, or he needs the pickup, or his agency supplied the car and didn’t spend money on it.
I don’t know exactly why, but I have noticed it seems many surveillance vehicles lack air conditioning. So he has done what I have seen vehicular surveillance do all over in hot weather when stationed in hot cars in parking lots, waiting on calls to enter stores to follow targets – he popped his car door open to get as much cool outside air in as possible. It is either that, or some resident in the neighborhood likes sitting outside in full sun in a black car, with their car door open. Remember that pattern, because the open car-door of a loitering vehicular unit is actually another theme you will see in the next section, as well as in your own travels.
So, just a short, quick detection route, and already you have a high-probability detection event with this guy, a mid-level with the car leading you in, and a possible in the lady with the carriage, and every intersection, and the turns on each side of this guy, were covered when you came to them. What are the chances, during the middle of the day in a neighborhood with only about fifty houses?
This old white car is a low-level, maybe/possible event.
Although nobody is in it, look how the back is tinted. If I were surveillance, I would tint the back of my car like that, park it, and then hop in the back to call the passing of a vehicle I was following.
If this is surveillance, this is more what you could expect from a pro. The only fault would be that the very nice house already has two very nice cars, making me think they might not need a third car, and if they got a third it would look nicer than that, especially given the paver driveway is old enough to have weeds growing in the cracks, and yet it is perfectly flat, indicating a quality job with a quality base layer laid down properly, which is expensive.
It is a very low-likelihood event, but it is something which may not fit in the environment, which might be amenable to surveillance, and which you will look for in the future. But you only need that level of paranoia in Russia if you are an elite spy posing a state-level-threat, where they would roll out their most elite, camouflaged, invisible operators.
In America you would see this level of surveillance just by being mildly politically active, or even just being marked in grade school as a high IQ free-thinker. Here, Russia is probably not using its “A,” “B,” “C,” or even D teams, since it knows the Google car is videoing, and all of these characters are likely to get burned. I am actually more uncertain about the car because it would be so good, and I wouldn’t expect that level of good for a mere Google car follow.
Across from this house is a turnoff to the right on a dirt road which the car with the open door is watching, to see if we took it:
Zoom in behind you, and you can see he selected that spot to have a clear sightline to this intersection:
As we get to the end of the road, off to the right, we have a woman in the next neighborhood over, who has opened the back of her car, and is walking away, turning 90 degrees, and going around the back corner of the house.
What is weird is in the next shot she has turned 90 degrees again, and is walking away from the house.
If she was surveillance, she had to get to that location from the next neighborhood over, something not at all strange in the world of surveillance with radio coordination. Alone, she wouldn’t do anything to the probability. This is not even a low-probability event, though it is interesting you couldn’t get to be alone back here, even at the back of this loop where there shouldn’t have been anyone. Not being able to find solitude, itself, can be a sign.
However I mention it for three reasons. One, if I knew I was under coverage, and she is there when I was just about to enjoy a moment alone, that is potentially coordinated timing. You are looking for rare events which could have happened at any time of day, but they happen to occur just as you were almost alone, and you see this timing over and over again, everywhere you go. I would try to get a good look at her, and remember her face and her car, to see if I saw her again.
Two, she would be a good example of what surveillance can do, to look natural and unlikely to be surveillance, and render itself almost totally undetectable. These people take their work seriously, and work hard to look like they couldn’t possibly be surveillance. For that reason, she is useless for any detection purposes, beyond her being right there, just as you would otherwise have found a moment of solitude.
Which brings us the final point of significance, which is, you went somewhere where you should have been alone and you were not alone. When you are under coverage, the biggest sign is, every time you almost get a moment alone to enjoy some solitude, something happens. A bicyclist happens by, a plane flies over, a helicopter is hovering over a distant treeline with a sightline to you, a dog-walker comes around a corner, a car just happens to pull in the parking lot, some maintenance guy happens by to clean trash cans or fix something up.
Early on, before I saw my surveillance, I took my two dogs to a lovely park. We were almost alone, when I looked up, and a small helicopter was hovering a half mile away over a treeline, just sitting there, until I returned to the parking lot, where some guy was cleaning out the empty trash cans despite the park being so remote and unknown that nobody should have been there.
If that happens predictably all of the time, enough times, no matter what it looks like, it is indicative of surveillance.
As we are heading out, we come to this, in roughly a symmetrical position compared to the other car on the other side of the loop:
Just a couple of guys with briefcases, standing by the side of the road, with their car parked hastily on the other side. Of course they both have briefcases, so they must be on some sort of official business, and aren’t there watching you as surveillance operators. How many people, in that neighborhood stand by the side of the road with briefcases each day? But they were there, in the two-second window, as you passed.
These guys don’t appear to be going to or coming from the house there. When you first see them, they are pointed at the house, as if they are going to it. But they don’t approach it, instead they turn around as you drive by, and then just stand there.
From the moment you see them, until you are as far down the road as you can be, they stand right there, and don’t move, one with arms crossed. It appears they just popped out of the car on the opposite side of the road, ran across the street, and they stood there. If you were running a surveillance detection route here, they are definitely suspicious, and up the probability. In reality, it is the Google car in Russia – so those guys are definitely surveillance.
There is a guy on the left as you go out, talking on his cell phone, but the hood of his car is up, and he could have hid inside the house and looked, so I would say he is probably not. Surveillance will tend to remain totally unseen, or get right up next to you, obvious, while acting innocent. He is here:
Before we leave, it is worth noting there may be more to this little circuit than meets the eye. One, that was a decent amount of coverage for a simple 90-second neighborhood jaunt where you probably should not have seen anyone normally, in a nation where there is not a lot of surveillance from my other observations of it on Streetview.
Two, why didn’t the Google car do the rest of the neighborhood? On the overhead you can see where the two guys were standing, a turn off led to the rest of the neighborhood, and all we did was about a third of the neighborhood. The rest of the neighborhood had no Streetview coverage when this circuit occurred. Three, it was a fairly nice neighborhood with nice cars, making me wonder if somebody important lived there. And then there was this – a surveillance camera set up to catch plates as cars enter, seen here from the side:
From an earlier image Google deleted:
More cameras, covering a large area of the neighborhood:
Remember, in 2012 Russian surveillance began harassing American diplomats. I assumed at the time, the massive global intelligence operation of the Western Stasi began to flex its surveillance/harassment muscle against the Russians, breaking a long-running detente between intelligence operations, and the Russian harassment was retaliation.
Here we have what is probably a CIA operation driving into this nice neighborhood, taking only one loop, and then taking off.
There is something interesting in there, and the obvious surveillance presence was the Russians counter-harassing the Google car, as a form of protest. Of course amusingly, this was about one fifth of what I would see as surveillance, were I arriving at my home in a residential neighborhood just like that in America, but that is neither here nor there.
Moving on, cruise out, turn left on the main drag, and pull into the gas station on the right, being sure to maintain the 2012 timeline. There is no point looking around as you head out of the neighborhood on this little leg because you have jumped timelines back to the beginning, and are just replaying the photos you saw when you drove in.
Just before you hit the main road, you will notice this posted vehicular unit has pulled off and is sitting on the corner across the street, observing the Google Car, waiting to call your direction of travel:
Once you hit the main road, you would have been on another timeline yet again, this time, August of 2018.
In this timeline, another pedestrian is standing there, this time directly across the street with a sightline to the intersection. Unfortunately Google has again deleted that image from its database, replacing the whole segment I used with new footage shot just two months after I had originally published this piece. However had they not, this is what you would have seen:
The old, now inoperative image address was here.
Examining the pedestrian, it appears he is not walking either on the sidewalk, or into or out of the store. Ask the question you should always ask of a pedestrian. Where is he coming from, and where is he going to? If that is difficult to answer, it may be because he is loitering. And if he is loitering at an intersection, it may be for you, since a posted commit unit at an intersection, placed there to call your direction of travel, is a normal surveillance procedure.
In the new photo, there is no pedestrian across the street, however there is a vehicle parked at the now paved intersection of the loop behind you:
So to reiterate, if you are under coverage, this intersection would have a pedestrian or vehicular unit present at it as you arrive at it. Of course, this is the google car, driving during a period of “surveillance unrest” between superpowers, so I would have expected somebody there, given the Google car was certainly under coverage, and that is what you saw.
Again, in your daily life, these things are not dispositive, and you cannot say anything with certainty. You merely observe, and see if you begin to notice patterns of anything around that appear unusual which are repeating, as you have seen here. You want to notice statistically unlikely events repeating at statistically unlikely frequencies. In America, if you look, you will eventually see it.
Individuals loitering at intersections, even alone in the middle of nowhere, is a theme you will see again in future installments. It is a procedure of the physical surveillance which blankets the West, which is embedded in every neighborhood in America, and which is tasked with spying on every citizen, to maintain their file, and the files of their children.
Continuing on, as you approach the gas station in the original tour, in another photo which is now deleted, there is an SUV parked in the shadow, by the gas station sign:
What is it doing there? Why didn’t it pull closer to the station? It isn’t getting gas, or going inside the station. It kind of looks like it is using the sign and shadow for some concealment from oncoming traffic as it loiters. In the original timeline, you could back up on the highway while watching it, by hitting your down arrow key while pointed at it, and you would see how in this deleted image, the sign obscured the car, in the center of this image behind the sign, as you got farther away from it. Notice that he could still see you in his driver’s side rearview mirror:
So a glance in his rear view mirror will allow him to see you clearly, but you cannot see him. One thing surveillance operators are taught in vehicular surveillance school is the power of car mirrors to allow you to observe a target, while minimizing your profile to the target. They can see you, but you cannot see them. Combined with his use of the sign as concealment, that is a professional.
Unfortunately, when you originally would jump into the gas station, you jumped timelines to a different trip, this time to July of 2017. But in that timeline, another SUV appeared to have been parked where the SUV above was parked, and when you pull in, it pulls out and takes off after you pass. Looking back:
Behind him, is another car which watched you pass by as well, though it is unclear what they are doing:
I have noticed, very often those in surveillance will seek out jobs which utilize “branded” business trucks, from plumbing and electrical contractors, to cable TV techs. I assume they like the idea that a branded vehicle with some business labeled clearly on the outside will tend to make people think they are not surveillance. In addition, such jobs will offer the surveillance operator access to other intelligence, be it the access a taxi-driver has to a passenger or a contractor or repairman’s access to denied areas like home interiors, or business offices.
So ask yourself why would a car be parked in a gas station lot, as far from everything as it could be, and take off just as you pull in? He is not going to the store. He is not getting gas. Why would two SUVs, years apart, have done the exact same thing on two different trips by the Google car? It could be innocent, but you have two doing it on two different trips, and it leaves just as you arrive, as if it doesn’t want to remain there once you pull in, lest you ask what it is doing sitting away from everything and loitering.
A quick word on repetitions like this. It is my suspicion surveillance groups are assigned sectors, and tend to work the same areas over and over again, tracking different targets in their sector. Maybe for a few days every six to eight months, you get surveillance teams assigned to you to polish your file, but these people, in their sector, are doing that to different Americans, every day, over and over, in the same sector.
As a result, they discover certain spots work better than others for maximizing visibility of passing targets, while minimizing the profile of the surveillance operator watching the target. Certain covers fit better than others in certain places. Certain routines and movements give a better advantage than others. As they follow different people through the same places day after day, the members of the team will develop similar patterns which you may pick up on if you pass through that area multiple times. Somebody will always be sitting in a certain spot, usually a different person each time. Or there will always be somebody doing the same thing, usually a different person, and so on. There is always a bum with a sign on a corner, always a coffee drinker with a newspaper on a bench, always a dog-walker near a dog park, but not in it. They will be in the same position, using the same covers, positioned the same way. I suspect hiding by this sign as people passed, or entered and exited that neighborhood, was one such pattern this sector’s team developed.
Getting gas is always fun, because how much gas you have in your tank is key operational information to a surveillance team. It tells them the range of your vehicle, as well as the mpg of the vehicle, once they are following you. That tells them how far you can drive at any point, and when you will need to stop for gas next. They consider that important operational information, especially if they one day lose you, and acquiring it is a high priority.
So they have to get close at gas stations. One day I will show funny video of three guys, all filling cars around my car at a station, all talking into their chests as I pay for gas inside.
We will end this trip there, as from there the Google car moves into a more populous area, which will dilute the signal produced by the surveillance within a larger pool of regular people, making it harder to notice.
So a short surveillance detection route, and you have one low probability event when you pull in with the carriage lady, one medium event at the first intersection, and three events in the loop. In addition, there is the gas station car always parked by the sign, and the fact a commit unit was always loitering around that intersection when you happened by.
Now that was a very short surveillance detection route. You see how if you keep jumping off and running routes in unpopulated areas, one after another, and you keep seeing activity like that, you can begin to uncover the probability of your surveillance coverage, even though it is trying to look normal.
That is what spies do before going to meetings. Or at least they did, before things got this bad in the West, and the domestic Stasi-like networks became so pervasive that as you drove, there was no need to have anyone follow you as there were agents posted to every street corner, radioing control as targets passed.
But using these routes to see it here, you will grow sensitive to what surveillance looks like, and how it operates. You will develop a feel for it, which will border on psychic awareness. Once you are sensitive to it, you are going to see it throughout your neighborhoods and towns in America, even if you do not run detection routes. The American Stasi is now all over, and shockingly, there are a ton of Americans who seem to enjoy betraying fellow citizens for this foreign network that is destroying our nation.
And still more nuances will begin to jump out at you as your skills develop. There are ways they drive which are different from regular people just absent-mindedly going to a destination. There are ways they look at others which are different from regular people, possibly due to a life spent deceiving others while trying to gauge their effectiveness at fooling them. And there are different ways they act, while following targets, compared to normal people going about their own day without concern for what anyone else is doing.
In the West, once you are sensitized, you will see the surveillance everywhere, and you will quickly find, it is almost impossible to lose a tail, as your coverage is more akin to driving through a cloud of surveillance which blankets your entire nation.
Conversely, in Russia, Google, itself a division of the elite Cabal of ultra-wealthy and powerful individuals who run the world, probably chose drivers who worked for Western/Cabal intelligence, so they could exploit the video produced by the vehicle. I would assume the company sought to shut the Russians out, so Russia had to assign surveillance assets to the Google car to protect their homeland.
It is another good sign that if patriots in the West ever need a fallback position to secure themselves, until some sort of unrest opens up opportunities to purge from America whatever this operation is which has taken over the West, Russia might make a good choice. It may even ultimately prove a potent ally, should a conflict begin in the West, between the regular people and the surveillance people.
That may also be why we see the Cabal of elites and the media machine it controls, trying to demonize Russia in the eyes of the majority of the West. They hope to dissuade us from forming any sort of alliance with the Russians, who could one day be our most potent ally against the criminal conspiracy subverting the governments of the West, which seek to control everything.
The Russians could offer us counter-intelligence or technical support against whatever coverage is on us. They could provide sources of information and direction, on competing with the more established Stasi information outlets to better disseminate truthful information and ideas among ourselves to combat the intelligence operation’s propaganda. Or they might help us overcome other factors which our Stasi-supported enemies are presently using to manipulate us, and make us weak.
And if things ever did go kinetic in America, Russia could offer a first-world level of intelligence support to any American citizens opposed to the takeover of our nation by a foreign intelligence operation run by a hostile group of foreign globalist elites.
The single biggest thing any American revolution against this conspiracy would need is a detailed roster of the domestic surveillance machine, including names and addresses of this secret society of Stasi informants working against all of America. In a revolutionary scenario, there is no path to victory for American patriots, which would not first begin with blinding the domestic surveillance machine of this criminal conspiracy. To do that, patriots would need to know who was in the conspiracy at the neighborhood level.
I would be shocked if Russia did not already have a detailed roster of America’s domestic Stasi machine. Simply by using artificial intelligence to analyze vehicular traffic patterns readily accessible through regular satellite surveillance systems, as well as commercially available databases of cell phone geolocation data, it would be a small matter to identify vehicles and people engaging in patterns of travel which are indicative of surveillance.
Were Russia not to have done this already, given the massive strategic benefits of being able to identify the conspiracy’s spies, I would be shocked.
Perhaps some day we will even have a national Targeted Individual Day, to complain about the physical surveillance in America. We could mark it with rallies outside the Russian Embassy, asking the Russians and Vladimir Putin to intervene in America in support of the civil rights of the Americans who are being targeted by this criminal machine that has infiltrated our government and its intelligence community.
I’d imagine the optics of a crowd of ten thousand Americans, featuring large signs with the pictures of Detective Miosotis Familia, Deputy Natalie Corona, Deputy Brad Garafola, Officer Matthew Gerald, and Corporal Montrell Jackson, as well as other victims like Brain Mancini and Myron Mays, noting they were all killed by this operation, and their murders were a direct result of the program, would also help to draw law enforcement’s attention to the problem.
