Surveillance Detection – Dominican Republic Street Coverage

I wanted to do a surveillance detection piece on Haiti to show the level of Stasi-like control on the ground, so people could see the chaos which periodically erupts there, such as when a 28 strong force of Mercs killed the President, is more organized and controlled, but unfortunately they do not have any Google Streetview coverage there. I usually assume that means somebody important is hiding something there, especially when the country is not hostile to the US. The only way Google was not driving though there with the Google car is if CIA told them they could not.

The Dominican Republic next door has a few areas mapped out spottily, so I picked a nice little loop, and dove in, and this is the result. Note, this was the first place I looked at. So I didn’t need a few hours to cherrypick a spot, although admittedly when I look for a spot I do use specific criteria.

Mostly, the place should be sparsely populated. If an area is too crowded there will be too much background activity for the surveillance to get lost in. A neighborhood which is empty during the day is ideal, as the people you see shouldn’t be there, and this stands out. I also want a few intersections, where they will need eyes on to call your decision to the team, so they can guide a following vehicle to follow you out of your sight, and get the team ahead of you, so you are running into them, and it doesn’t look like they are following you.

As always links are to the Google Streetview images so you can go there and look around to see yourself firsthand, what it looks like to be a target.

Here is the overhead of our little loop, with key points of interest to surveillance planning numbered, so you can go there. You will start a position 6, drive in, take the first right, and then follow the loop back out:

We will begin by examining point one, the deepest point in the loop. Here is what you see looking north:

If this were a dead end you drove down spontaneously, you probably would not see anything most times, since you would be stopping and turning around, and thus you would bump into anyone following you in. Sometimes if surveillance knows you are going to a dead end, and they think you might be doing something, they can plant somebody in there beforehand, for you to bump into, just to see what you are doing. But usually they won’t follow you in unless they are already burned, and it is just a harassment op.

On a loop, they may stick somebody down there for you to pass by, just to keep a continuous eye on your direction of travel, especially if somebody is behind you out of sight, and they don’t want you flipping direction and running into your following unit. Here in this image, that lone guy you pass is this guy:

He has great sightlines to most of the end loop, and was watching you the whole way. Here he is circled, from back when you were just beginning the other side of the loop:

If you go and drive the route, you will see him a little discombobulated, getting on the curb, getting off, starting to walk away, walking back. He probably felt a little exposed.

Going north, there is the cross street between points 2 and 3, and both intersections on each side of that cross street need to be covered. This is a shot of intersection 2, taken from the north, with the cross street highlighted in red:

There is nobody there to see which way you go, which would complicate things for a vehicle which is almost certainly following you into the neighborhood out of sight. You could turn around and bump into them, forcing them to leave to avoid burning the operation. Then you could turn around again, as they are forced to leave, and you could go deeper into the neighborhood without a following vehicle, at least until they could get another one in there.

I assume that is a procedure violation. So they need to know what you are doing here. If you drive to the middle of the red line in the middle of the cross street, and look at the house, you will notice it has two surveillance cameras trained on each intersection:

I would bet everything those cameras are connected to the internet for remote viewing, and as the Google car was making its turns onto and off that cross street, the voice in the earpiece was watching. Tough to say what is up with the house. I would assume it is the local Stasi observation post for that neighborhood, but it is possible the owner just rigged up a nice surveillance system, covered the intersections as good practice, and connected it to the internet. As he did all that, his neighborhood observation post was watching, got the password, and logged in to use the cameras whenever it needed them.

The next intersection is number four, and here you are on the northeast street, looking northwest:

Look far enough, and you will notice a car with the tailgate door open. If you drive up there you will see this guy watching the intersection:

Surveillance likes watching intersections. Amusingly, he looks exactly like the guy you saw in the book in Chapter Six, in southern California, here:

You can see how that little surfboard spruced up his cover, but they are still both doing the same thing – in two different countries.

So now you are on the way out. The following vehicle can pull in closer, since it will now complete this operation and break off to join another follow and it doesn’t matter if you see them briefly on the way out.

I assume they want to move quickly to get to their next gig, as I get the impression they get compensation based on how much they do and how many follows they take part in. I even get the impression they get extra for more important tasks, like taking primary command of the target as opposed to filling in a blocking position which is never actually needed, and so on. Here as you reach point five, you can see the dark SUV appear way back:

It has been a set distance behind you, almost out of sight, as you went into the neighborhood, probably to keep a foot surveillance person nearby to drop off and send to you if you begin doing something interesting like approaching a dead drop, or stealing something.

Here is a zoom in:

Now you are approaching the main intersection with the main street. Notice you have a walker coming from the right, entering the neighborhood just as you exit. You will see that type of mobile foot unit timed precisely to your approach to decision points all the time for some reason. Additionally, surveillance likes organizing it as an entry as you exit, or an exit as you enter, be it a neighborhood, a parking lot, and building, just about anything. You turn in a parking lot they will be pulling out just as you get there. You turn on a street, they are turning off just as you approach. You exit a building, they are coming in. You enter a building and they are exiting. I assume they think if you are leaving the neighborhood as someone else is arriving, you will assume since you are both doing the opposite thing, that person couldn’t possibly be following you.

Behind you is the dark SUV which has caught up to you:

A closer look at it, as well as a car positioned with a sightline to the intersection, with its hood up:

Another closer look. Putting up the hood on a static vehicle post is actually so common it was featured in an episode of Burn Notice, where Barry watched master thief Natalie come to an intersection and make a decision, while he was standing in front of his car with the hood up, rubbing his hands on a rag. You don’t look at people standing next to a car with the hood up and grease on their hands, nor do you think much of it. Your mind fills in all the details of why they are there without you even thinking about it, as you are just grateful to not have a broken down car yourself.

As a cover for action, it is almost similar to hypnosis, where it is presented so subtly your brain essentially tells you the lie surveillance wants you to believe itself, bypassing the critical factor – unless you read this site, in which case every car with a hood up triggers your suspicion and a critical examination.

As you hit the intersection, you will notice there is static posted surveillance on the corner. That is probably there all the time, and was not brought in for the Google car. Look around a city sometime and you will be amazed at how much of that you see. You cannot evade the surveillance net now in major Western cities, because of units like this, which blanket such cities with inescapable coverage to document the movements of targets of interest, as well as everyone else:

Another look as you pull out and take a right, looking back:

In hot locales, posted surveillance quickly learns the benefits of shade.

Just for fun I continued to the next corner, and saw this guy there. Notice he is parked in shade, because even though he is on a motorbike, and has no reason to sit there, he knew he was going to be there for a while.

Goodly amount of pit sweat and even some drippage from his forearm to the underside of his sleeve, so he has not been driving his bike with the wind whipping through his shirt. He has been sitting there just for you:

The corner on the other side of the main intersection you just left, actually has a house across the street with people who just sit there all day. The guy is up standing and facing the Google car because he knew it was coming and wanted a good look. It is possible a local Targeted Individual, or someone else of interest lives on that street, if they have a house on the corner always watching:

Again, you get the picture. This is a dirt-poor shithole. It shouldn’t have the money to run every corner of the city with a radio-directed, informant-rich, domestic surveillance op made up of cars and motorbikes as well as foot units and even homes,  tracking all movement all throughout the day, with special teams for interesting targets like the Google car. And yet, there it is. You can see why I think a lot of gifted people are married to American Stasi Deep Cover infiltration assets, and have no idea. This thing is weird.

These characters would have been all throughout Haiti, on every corner. There is no way to roll an almost 30 man team of mercs into the country for a coup, as once happened, with them rolling around checking exfil routes, scoping the target with cameras, probably running surveillance themselves on the Presidential security and its procedures, and nobody picks up on it.

I actually run pretty aggressive autismo-level counter-surveillance now, even including cameras off my car. I happened to once drive by a billionaire’s house. He could be a genuine genius who cleaned up, at least according to the public version of his life, or maybe he is just a Stasi money manager. Regardless, you’ve heard of him. Later that day I was writing for my website with the surveillance at my house running in the background, which is far beyond any normal surveillance system.

A car approached and slowed before it hit my driveway, stopping for a moment in the road about 50 feet before my place and out of sight of my house. It was coming from a direction consistent with the billionaire’s house, though I didn’t notice that at the time.

No normal person in my situation would ever have noticed this, but I had detection set up everywhere and by now I was riveted. A car window rolled down, and I heard the driver start up a loud Elvis song, Bright Lights City. He was deploying a cover as a goof listening to music as he drove and opening a window to get a better look at my place.

So by now I am thinking, this doesn’t look like normal American Stasi surveillance, which just revs its engines as it drives by, or occasionally hoots and hollers out the window as it passes. The Stasi and I were way past cloak and dagger, or them even giving enough of a fuck to put out this type of effort at this point. This car then proceeded to drive at a normal speed along the front of my property line with the music blaring, and I could see the driver looking closely toward my house through the open window as he passed. A few minutes later he went in the opposite direction, again Elvis singing, “Bright lights city gonna set my soul, gonna set my soul on fire!”

I assumed the billionaire had a surveillance system deployed in front of his house with camera detectors, designed to shine IR light at cars as they drive by, and pick up the reflection of the IR light off the face of any imaging chips in cameras pointing at his driveway. I have 4K cameras running out all four sides of my car. I could easily have been a hit team, taking 4K video out the sides and front and back of my car, getting imagery of the front of his residence, in preparation for something more aggressive.

His security probably grabbed my plate from their video, pulled my address, and one of his guys did his own video drive-by, just to see if they could see anything interesting, like maybe a bunch of cars from a 28 merc team crashing at my pad in preparation for the big event that night at his place. I hadn’t given a thought to the fact that guy may have had such a sophisticated security operation, pulling IDs and running full background checks in hours on anything curious passing by his house, or that my driving past his house on my way somewhere would have set off all sorts of warning bells. But his people were apparently on their game. All I could think as I sat ensconced in my command center surrounded by surveillance monitors and deployed sensors was, “Touche’!”

But the point is, surveillance is a well known security measure, even used by private individuals to degrees you would not expect. These guys in Haiti did a lot of prep work on the ground, in neighborhoods where the locals run coverage corner by corner and know who is supposed to be where, and who is new and therefore interesting. I am sure the second they touched down in the country their military histories had red warning lights and sirens going off, and the surveillance assigned to them was off the charts. And there were dozens of other places they would get picked up.

If they were going to exfil by boat, marinas are hives of surveillance activity, with numerous civilian pleasure crafts docked in the marina fitted out with sophisticated monitoring equipment and manned by local Stasi agents, especially down there, where drugs are a thing. Airports and small airfields too.

If they were going kinetic, they were doing drivebys to photo the target in the runup to the big show. They probably followed some security home to see where they lived, and if it might be beneficial to take them out at their home, before they had their game faces on.

All that creates hundreds of points where this 28 man team should have tripped a surveillance trigger, been designated interesting, and been buried under coverage. And that would be, even if they hadn’t triggered flags in computers when they began entering the country. These were US trained Columbian military working as private mercs, so you know their names and passports are flagged, even if just for a passive glance at where they are going as they pass through. Move 30 into one area in a few days, and somebody local in the Stasi’s intelligence operations is going to wonder if something is up. You could say the same thing about 9/11. Surveillance is designed not just to watch, but to catch these things.

And yet, they were allowed to kill the President. Which means what you see above, is a massive ground surveillance op, deployed in a nation, which is not answering to the government or its leaders, and apparently those leaders and the government either do not know it exists, or their government forces are helpless to get rid of it.

And I will tell you right now, in America, where the ground surveillance runs just as tight a game, and where I have no doubt it was all on top of the 9/11 hijackers when they showed up as new characters in neighborhoods where the local Stasi forces knew everyone, this ground surveillance op, and every single one of its operatives knew when those planes hit, it could have stopped the attacks, and chose not to, because it wanted the US hit that way.

What you are looking at on these pages, is not American.