TMZ has video of the top candidate to be the shooter:
Initially the individual is seen walking through a neighborhood, to the school, dragging one leg, it is thought because he had inserted the gun barrel down one leg of his pants to smuggle it to the scene:
Later the individual, marked by thee red arrow, is seen in the distance trying to sneak through backyards as leaves the scene:
What you will notice in the next frame is a male-and-female-couple foot surveillance team is paralleling the individual on the street:
When the camera zooms back you see there is another solitary foot surveillance operator (two couples might seem statistically weird on a street like this with no other foot traffic we can see) who is pacing them, about twenty feet ahead of them:
What they are doing is trying to walk somewhere which is plausibly a place you could see people walking innocently, like the street, as they parallel the target, who is trying to avoid places people would normally walk. By spreading out about twenty feet apart, they are hoping to maximize the ability of their combined team to catch glimpses of the subject between houses as they parallel him.
You will notice the hand of one foot operator come up the minute the subject disappears behind something:
Surveillance procedure in both foot follows and vehicular follows is to routinely update the central control on when the target is in sight and when you lose sight, using the terms “Sighted” and “Unsighted,” as well as noting location and the time of each broadcast. When in a vehicle you also note the speed the target is moving. So in a car, as the target hits a sharp curve in the road ahead of you and you lose sight of them, you might call on the radio, “Unsighted, exit 16, 6:17, 58 miles per hour.”
The reason is, if you lose the target and need to reacquire them, either the navigator in the surveillance team, or the central control will look at the last location the target was sighted, and use the time and last known speed to calculate how far the target has likely traveled since they were lost, which becomes the radius of a circle centered on the target’s last known location.
It is assumed the target will be within that circle, so you can then look at what is in that circle which the target might have traveled to, such as a known associate’s house, a gas station, or a McDonald’s restaurant, as well as points of egress from the circle and intersections where you could post a surveillance unit to set a perimeter, and you can then secure the perimeter and send surveillance to each location the target might be found at until you reacquire them.
In the photo above the foot surveillance operator is almost certainly radioing control using the word, “unsighted” and the time.
But, “Wait a minute,” you are saying, “FBI claims they do not know if the shooter is in the state or not, or even where he may be, or who he is.“ That is correct.
What you are seeing in the video above is American Stasi surveillance, which is operating completely outside the authority of the United States government. It is basically operational support for a criminal intelligence operation trying to take over the nation. It will only interface with the FBI where it needs to, such as to use the FBI’s authority to attack and degrade a target in some way.
Indeed, I would assume in this case, the American Stasi set up the shooting of Charlie Kirk, and in the video above, central control is being updated in real time on the shooter’s exfiltration because if he were to be stopped by Police and taken into custody, central control would have to arrange an Epstein-like end for him while he was being held in the jail.
The Charlie Kirk shooting, in many ways, bears similarities to the attacks of 9/11. There were several cases where people seemed to know Charlie was about to be shot. There was this post on Twitter, by a user who since deleted their account:
This was seen on TikTok prior to the shooting:
There were reports from the scene people were chanting at Kirk that he was about to be killed:
There was a book published the day before the assassination with all the details about it, and the user has since sought to change the publication metadata to hide that fact:
And then there is the fact this shooter is undoubtedly what his neighborhood surveillance unit would mark down as “interesting,” which would get him full coverage. He is political, a gun enthusiast, a good shot, driven enough to act, and probably frequents extremist websites online.
The level of monitoring his neighborhood unit would give him would include internet monitoring, so if he was searching out Charlie Kirk’s schedule, that would be directed to analysis, as would searches on Google Earth for satellite overheads of the venue Kirk would be speaking at. Analysis would figure out pretty quickly what he was up to.
If, as I would suspect, the shooter made a dry run to his final firing position, to make sure he could get on the roof and see how concealed the weapon would have to be, and if he examined, in person, various infiltration and exfiltration routes, he would have been accompanied on those trips, without his knowledge, by surveillance, which would have recorded it all. Trips to the range, purchases of any items required, like new ammunition, conversations with other Charlie Kirk haters online, and any other communications with others would all be scrutinized.
Basically, the American Stasi was designed to pick up on events like these through constant granular monitoring, and maintaining multiple avenues by which such a plot would be picked up on. Had the shooter’s neighborhood unit missed him somehow, the college surveillance would have spotted him making a dry run and followed him home to make sure his local unit got more coverage on him. Had the college unit missed him, surveillance monitoring forums online where political ideologues converse would have picked up on him. From guys at the range, to friends in his social circle, surveillance is designed to capture threads of such a plot somewhere, and then dig into the plot and unravel it ahead of time.
Finally, you have the fact that surveillance was tracking this guy above, but he is still floating around, out in the wild.
9/11 was very similar. For starters, you have the American Stasi, diffused into neighborhoods and assigned to get into Mosques and monitor everyone. Anyone without a file becomes interesting just for that, and when they land in some locality and begin laying their head there, it is the job of the local commander to notice them and figure out their deal, and begin their file.
Here, in the case of 9/11, you have radical Muslims in flight schools saying they do not need to land or take off, they just need to know how to steer the plane in the air.
You had numerous times hijackers should have shown up on the radar. Mohammed Atta had a plane engine die on the runway, as the plane was about to take off. He and his friends just left the plane right there, queued for takeoff, and they went home, forcing airport workers to move the plane, and the FAA to investigate why they did not clear the plane from the runway themselves. Even actor James Woods famously reported some of the hijackers to the FBI, telling Agents he knew how you are not supposed to use the word in conjunction with plane travel, but the men he saw on his flight making a dry run were going to “hijack” a plane.
There is no way surveillance did not pick up on the hijackers, get into their business, and unravel the plot months before the attacks.
I did not record it, and you cannot find the video now, but at the time, ABC interviewed an investment banker who worked in the World Trade Center, who noted that on his way to work on September 11th, he thought to himself it must have been some sort of Hindu holiday, as all the Indian guys who manned food carts around the Twin Towers had not shown up for work.
Those food cart guys would have been immigrants brought here by intelligence specifically to perform surveillance against us for the American Stasi, and their food carts would have been essentially given to them as covers for them to serve as posted surveillance in Manhattan’s Financial District. Their absence would be further indication that domestic surveillance, the American Stasi, was well aware 9/11 was coming, and warned its operatives.
That all would further support our assumption that US domestic surveillance, like Congress, Hollywood, the News Media, Finance, and other foundational bedrocks of America, was taken over by Israeli intelligence using dual loyalty Jewish Americans, who were recruited by Israel as known assets, and placed in high positions of power in return for their fealty.
Many decry noting the prominence of Jewish Americans in such positions of power, especially in numbers which so exceed the percentage of Jews in America. However I believe such a vitriolic response is a cover, which seeks to make the issue about regular American Jews in positions of power (which of course there is nothing wrong with), when the real issue is there are so many Jews in those positions of power because they all are active agents of a foreign, Israeli intelligence operation, which used its power over American society to place them there, to serve its interests.
By turning the issue into one of discrimination and hostility to regular American Jews, it distracts from the fact a foreign intelligence agency has subverted American institutions for a foreign nation’s interests, using American traitors.
Now, having been subverted by Israeli intelligence, the American Stasi is being used to gather blackmail on our leaders, which allows Israel undue influence over US government policy, as well as to spot American children who could one day be a problem for the conspiracy. It then acts to make sure they are neutralized while young by derailing their academics, often using the children of American domestic surveillance, posing as “friends.”
And I should add, I do not think Israeli intelligence is the top of the chain of criminality. If I had to guess, I would guess at the very top is a syndicate, maybe even frequently changing, of monied elites, some of whom may trace their bloodlines as far back as ancient Persia or even the Akkadian Empire. There are probably Middle Eastern Arab oil interests, European royals, and maybe even some Asian families with immense wealth who take part.
I think they primarily use Israeli intelligence to quarterback their operations in America because they do not trust American intelligence agencies to run the Stasi for a foreign interest, without Israeli agents watching over them. In addition, the Israelis have an in with American Jews over their shared religion. They can also play off the loyalty all Jews have to the state of Israel to try to sway them to perform actions which are not in America’s interests, by gaslighting them and telling them what they are doing is in the interest of Israel.
In both cases, the Charlie Kirk murder, and 9/11, it appears a lot of people knew what was coming.
In Charlie’s case, he had recently begun criticizing Israel on his platform, as he did here:
He had also recently ended up running afoul of Israel over his allowing Tucker Carlson and Meghan Kelly to speak at his Turning Point USA symposium, where they spoke about Jeffrey Epstein as a Mossad operation, and the issue of having Americans with dual loyalty to Israel serving in the government.
Finally he had recently been confiding to people that he feared if he did not say what Israel wanted him to say, Israel would kill him:
That Tweet was from almost a month ago.
Now you have video of the American Stasi, which seems to be compromised by the foreign government of Israel, tracking the shooter from the scene of the shooting and apprising control of the shooter’s exfiltration progress, but nobody called the Police or had him picked up, and for all we know the shooter could be in Israel right now outright, or in Mexico making his way to Israel.
America is penetrated, and now has an all-powerful criminal organization which is some combination of a James bond criminal syndicate and the CIA, which is all throughout American society. It needs to be revealed to the people, if only so they can begin to protect their children from it.
In my opinion though, we need to be rid of it, as it is probably the source of all the acrimony and misery we see today in American society.
Get rid off the American Stasi, and we can once again live like Americans lived in the fifties – in a country where we are all safe, innocent people are not being murdered left and right, and where all Americans are one big team, working together to truly make this nation a utopia for all.
We need to tell others about the American Stasi, and get them reading this website.
UPDATE – more surveillance seen on FBI’s presentation of surveillance camera video from the school:
What you will look for here is atypical traffic patterns. One method of surveillance detection is noticing atypical traffic patterns around you, especially cars which pass by right at transitional moments in your journey.
If you are somewhere there is usually no traffic, and your presence triggers traffic, at precise moments when you are changing how you are traveling (from on foot, to in a car), or your direction of travel (like at an intersection) that can be indicative of surveillance, and that traffic, be it foot traffic or vehicular traffic, is there for you.
This will hold even more, if the traffic clusters around you. Here, at 5:51 in the video, the shooter runs across the rooftop, and the parking lot is entirely empty prior to his arrival:
The shooter makes it to the edge of the building, and just as he begins to lower himself, but before he hits the ground, where parked cars would have obstructed the view of him, a surveillance vehicle drives by in the lower right corner at 6:12:
He was, at that moment, transitioning from traveling on the roof, to traveling on the ground.
At 7:01 the subject (circled below) is making his way to the main street, and there is absolutely not a single car on the main street (arrow), and the parking lot is empty:
At 7:08, subject reaches the end of the parking lot, two cars appear, one driving right by him:
At that moment, he was transitioning from traveling off paths on grass, to taking a sidewalk route.
Subject reaches the street, and is about to cross it, and now three cars are lined up waiting to exit the parking lot, and you have three more in the street:
Subject reaches the main road, and now has seven vehicles as well as foot surveillance in front and behind him:
Crossing the road, where he will leave the populated traveled areas, and enter the woods, is a major transition in his travels. The sudden surge in traffic in the area is shades of the guy dumping his wife’s torso in Chapter 19 of the book.
If you are ever operating, and peek out and see nobody around, and you step out and begin your operational activity and suddenly cars are driving by left and right, walkers are all over, and you do not recognize your op has just been burned beyond all recognition, you are not going to make it.
Surveillance here was just apprising control of the progress of their op, and probably would have run interference for this guy if you saw him and tried to take him down. Indeed, this character, who looks exactly like the kinds of surveillance operator you will see gangstalking/harassing you in grocery stores if you run afoul of the American Stasi, made a big deal of surrendering and asserting his Fifth Amendment rights after Charlie Kirk’s shooting, seemingly to help the shooter escape by convincing Police they had captured the attacker, and no longer needed to look for him escaping:
There is video of his detention here, where he dropped his pants to slow down the ability of the Police to get him clear of the scene. Just thinking to take blame on the spot, and taking the action, is quite operationally minded, never mind thinking to slow Police even more by dropping your pants. The guy is an operator.
And oddly enough the same guy was involved in the media/PR push blaming Al Qaida for 9/11 over two decades ago, almost like his operation assigned him to deflect blame it knew should have fallen on it after 9/11, and then put him here, running interference for the shooter:
But for those of you on the side of good, this thing will take you apart if you do not learn how to spot it, how it operates, and how to avoid it.
Of course ideally in a few years, we will expose this criminal enterprise fully, and get it taken down once and for all. Until then, you need to learn what we teach you here, and most of all, protect your children, because they are the real targets of this op,
