Photo by Richard Van De Water on Unsplash
All freedom-loving patriots, deep down, hold one belief – when the time comes, we will kill them all. If you deny that, either your belief in freedom is weak, or you are afraid of your true nature.
I would be lying if I said in the back of my mind I didn’t believe in rebellion as a last option, under a tyrannical regime. But there is one problem, and it is the entire subject of this site – the surveillance of the American Stasi.
In the book, available free on this site, we discussed how right now, no rebellion could take hold because of the surveillance. We discussed how the best way to examine how a rebellion would work, would be to examine a criminal act today. As an example, we showed a man who had murdered his wife in the privacy of his house, went to dump the body, and after holding back and letting him think the area was entirely isolated, surveillance swopped in just as he did the dump, and in doing so, revealed they had been listening in his house, as well as the size and ever-presence of their operation.
Criminal acts and rebellion share many things in common. Both are frowned upon by the state. Overt law enforcement mechanisms will thwart both, if given the chance. Success depends upon not being detected. And both are of interest to the surveillance.
So if you want to know how a rebellion would play out, you want to examine criminal acts, and how they worked out first. It is the purpose of this piece to show you there is absolutely no point in ever thinking you can resist the government today, no matter how tyrannical, unless you first publicly expose the surveillance, and get it destroyed first.
We will begin with the Go-Pro video one criminal shot of his crime – base jumping off the Freedom Tower in New York City:
You should watch the video first.
So, a group of three military-aged males with large bags, each filled with a full set of base-jumping gear, infiltrated the Freedom Tower – the site of the worst act of terrorism in history on US soil, in Manhattan’s Financial District – one of the most heavily surveilled places on earth. They made it to the top, jumped, and then fully escaped, captured only momentarily by some surveillance cameras on nearby buildings, after Police got a report of guys in parachutes landing.
Do you think the site was left that unprotected? Now the interesting part. If they were seen carrying large packages, which could have been shaped charges, into the World Trade Center construction site, after 9/11, why didn’t anyone notify NYPD and have them “accidently” intercepted by an NYPD roving security patrol?
If they had been terrorists that building would have been dropped, right into its footprint, a second time, before it even opened. Could they have been left alone because surveillance knew what they were doing? Could everyone be watched so closely, and their private conversations be covered so completely by their own neighborhood units, that they knew what they were doing before they even left their homes that night?
You can see the surveillance documenting their jump in the video, but you must know what to look for.
One thing you will notice when under coverage is coincidences. Coverage can’t stay on your tail, because people look for someone following them, so there is no use watching behind you for one car following you. Nor, with surveillance like the American Stasi deploys, or its counterparts in Europe, will you see the same faces or vehicles. There is no point in writing down license plates, or trying to remember shoes (the one part of a surveillance operator’s “costume” which is often unchanged when they change their appearance in the field).The networks today are too large, and the operations keep track of who follows you, so as to rotate those massive networks, and keep you from seeing the same people.
So in today’s high end surveillance the only thing you will notice are coincidences. You reach a corner to turn in a low traffic area, and another car pulls up to it from another direction just as you do, and has to wait as you turn in front of it. You drive by a side street, and another car pulls up to turn off it just as you pass by. You exit a parking lot, and another car also pulls out onto the street, from another parking lot on either side of you just as you do – usually heading in the opposite direction you are. You pull out of your driveway, and a car almost always happens to be driving the opposite way on your street, between your driveway and the first major intersection, so it can look in your windshield and radio to command how many people are in the car. These are procedures.
Taken alone, the chance of each coincidence being surveillance is small. But when you see coincidences all over, over and over again, the chance those are vehicular surveillance units following procedures and maintaining eyes on you gradually increases.
As with all surveillance detection you will never know with absolute certainty if you have coverage, with trained coverage. All you can do is establish probabilities in your mind, and as coincidence after coincidence piles up, realize that the chances you have coverage are increasing as well.
Here in the video, after he deploys his chute, you will notice there is one lone car pointing in his direction, pulling up to a stoplight, directly ahead of him, circled in red below (click for full size, and then watch the video):
Knowing how surveillance works, that is a vehicular surveillance unit, and there is a camera in it pointing up and videoing the parachutist’s descent. The jumpers chose a time to perform the jump when there are usually almost no cars on the road at that time, so it is not surprising most of the vehicles you will see will be surveillance.
Next, as he begins to pass over that intersection, just as he enters the sightline of the side street, another car pulls up to the the intersection, at the side street, and stops at the stoplight, facing his line of travel, with a perfect sightline to watch him as he descends, flying perpendicular to the vehicle’s orientation and right in front of it. The previous car will still be circled in yellow, and it will begin to pull away from the intersection just as he flies over it, and they lose their sightline to videotape him:
As we look for curious coincidences, notice the timing of the stoplight. Just as he passes over it, and the first vehicle loses a sightline, the light changes, stopping the second vehicle so it can video, as it lets the first vehicle exit the area of operations.
My surveillance once stopped me behind a car sitting in the road just before a train crossing gate which was up. As I began to pull around it to cross over the tracks, they lowered the gate, complete with the dinging and lights, as if a train was coming. When I stopped, the lights and dinging stopped and the gate began to raise, and as I began to go around the stopped surveillance vehicle again, the dinging began and the lights began to flash, and they lowered the gate again. We did that a few times, and then the gate raised, the car in front of me went over the tracks, and I was back on my way. There had been no train.
Obviously in the US there is a radio-controlled override for emergency services, which allows them to override a stoplight cycle and turn a red light green. I did not know there was something similar for train crossing gates, but apparently there is. Here, given the statistical probability of the light changing just as he passes over it is small, compared to it changing at any other time, I would say it is most likely you are seeing the surveillance team use the override to change the light at the exact right moment, assuming the light actually changed. Since they were the only ones down there, they may not have bothered to deploy the override, and just ignored the light.
As he exits the second car’s sightline, another vehicle has stopped in the road, and is just parked next to the center median with its headlights on, here circled below. If you go backward on the video, you will see it was stopped from the start of his jump, and never moves. That is a posted unit covering him about one third of the way in between intersections:
Another posted unit is sitting by the side of the road, circled here in blue, with its hazards flashing, about two thirds of the way between intersections. If that car were pulled over to the side of the road innocently, it would probably have pulled closer to the sidewalk. It remained out, as it needed that superior sightline to the intersection ahead, where our jumper will land. Again, they chose this time to jump because the streets should have been deserted:
Here he is about to touch down, and the intersection where he is landing appears empty, save for one car stopped ahead of him at the next intersection, here again, circled in red at the top of the screenshot:
He lands, and you can see the car stopped in front of him. Surveillance vehicles are fitted with hidden surveillance cameras pointing out all four sides of the car, which are always recording, and which can broadcast live to an operations center, using cellphone networks. I suspect the bandwidth from this traffic is why there needed to be a switch to 5G, which offers negligible speed increases on mobile devices.
That car is almost certainly videoing out its back, to capture his landing, and it might be being broadcast live to an operations center controlling this operation:
As he gathers his chute, he briefly glimpses behind him, and there are headlights back there. We will see these vehicles, circled below, more clearly in a moment:
Here are the vehicles behind him, two cars which just happened to be driving behind him as he flew over the road, and which drive by exactly after he lands. Their approach was timed to coincide perfectly with his landing. Any quicker, and they would have been in front of him the moment he touched down, and any slower, and they would have been farther behind, and not in position to do a close drive-by the instant after he landed:
Notice how they don’t stop or slow to take a better look. I would be curious and stop, maybe even ask the guy what was up, or if he needed help. But not them.
Look at how each moving car seen as he descends happened to have a perfect sightline to take in each stage of his descent. Car #1 pointing at him, Car #2 crosswise, Cars #3 and #4 lined up between the intersections so there is no deadzone, and then Car 5, stationary, videoing him from ahead of him as he lands, as car #6 and Car #7 were following on behind him to document the landing from behind and catch a quick drive-by of his escape, with a redundancy, since the close-up pass-by to ID him is the most important shot to get.
But it was not over there. Like any operator, this jumper immediately heads for the shadows, which is a dark spot on the sidewalk. As he hits the end of the sidewalk, if you look closely, you will see there is a person there in the shadows, on the sidewalk, circled in yellow below. They are only ever visible in silhouette:
If you look closely at the picture above, it would appear the person is kneeling to hide behind the hedges between him and the road, which the jumper used as his dropzone. His head is just below the hedges. He may also have his cell phone out in his right hand, something you commonly see with surveillance as they text updates or speak into the phone to update central control on their observations.
They get up quickly and pass by the jumper as he is running, and from the sound, it sounds as if they are on a skateboard or a scooter: Here the person has moved to his left to let him pass:
Here the foot surveillance operator is in the yellow circle as he passes our jumper, and you can see how the lighting falls on the sidewalk behind him, without him there:
You can slow the video to 25% speed, and you should be able to see him pass more clearly. When the jumper turns to look back at the person who just passed him, it appears the surveillance operator is positioned sideways on a skateboard, which is consistent with the sound as he passes:
Notice how thin and vertical he looks when he is not kneeling, and how high above the hedges his head is. So you had a guy with a skateboard, at 3AM, hiding behind hedges, with a sightline right to where our jumper was to land. And the second our jumper happened upon him, he got up and fled.
The positioning of a foot surveillance operator, posting him right there, kneeling behind cover, hidden at the dropzone, the fact the dropzone intersection had no cars at it, and the positioning of cars in front of and behind him, makes me think surveillance not only knew they were going to jump, it was eavesdropping on them as they planned where they would land, and how they would exfil.
I would assume at this point, it knew everything they planned to do that night, down to the most minor detail. I assume it placed the whole area around the WTC site under a surveillance “flag” which would have barred all NYPD personnel and other law enforcement from the scene, to prevent them from interfering in operational behavior by a surveillance target.
Surveillance is everywhere, even on the evening news, once you know what to look for. Did you see any of it on your first watch, or did your reality bias, assuming our free nations would never establish such a thing, leave you blind to it – even the kid kneeling behind the hedges?
Watch the video again now, and understand, had I made that jump, I would have instantly recognized I was burned as I approached the first intersection and saw a car pull up at just that moment. And at this point, I would have recognized every vehicle and the kid behind the hedges, in the first moment I encountered them. If you want to be free, you will need to read this site, and learn how to do that. It is a different world today.
You can see the problem this will pose, if one day tyranny rules, and it becomes time to water the tree of liberty. Surveillance picked up on an operation this harmless and pointless, performed by genuinely harmless, comically amusing guys, who probably would not be able to instantly pull the trigger on another human being, based solely on logical necessity, if it came down to it. How much more do you think they are watching the trigger-pullers of our kind, who could pose a threat in a revolutionary scenario?
How did they pick up on this jump? Surveillance is broken up into sectors, neighborhood by neighborhood, with a file archivist in each neighborhood responsible for knowing, in a personal sense (without ever making contact with them), and maintaining a file on, every person they are assigned in their sector. There is somebody living near you right now, who you have never met, who is assigned to you. And if they needed to, they could tell someone who you are, in a personal sense – your morality, your empathy, what you like, what you don’t like, and who you are as a person. They will know you more intimately than probably anyone else in your life.
They have listened in your home as you went to the bathroom, probably at some point videoed you in intimate moments with others over the course of your life, Gathered what blackmail they could on you, and they know everything about you. Even things you think nobody could possibly know.
How do they know all that? This operation listens inside everyone’s houses, just like the old Stasi Secret Police in East Germany, and they even watch video from inside the home in some.
In East Germany, it was easy, as everyone lived in small apartments in apartment buildings. All the Stasi had to do was purchase one apartment, clock when everyone went to work, and then each day technicians broke in and wired microphones into everyone’s apartments while they were out, sending the outputs to the monitoring apartment, where each feed was plugged into an old tape recorder, so anything interesting could be documented and recorded. And then they listened.
For surveillance, the neighbors are like TV shows, and some are more interesting than others. Herb, the overweight cubicle-worker, with no political beliefs, no aspirations, and 15 cats he spends each night baby-talking, is not going to be a hot TV Show they want to tune into every night.
On the other hand, the three base-jumper dudes who are breaking into buildings to do illegal jumps are an interesting show. Both simply for interest, and because you never know if at some point they eluded the net, met with someone, got recruited, and that is a cover life, meant to hide that one day they will divert once they are inside a building, and steal important documents, or even plant shaped charges on structural posts for an intelligence service like Iran.
When surveillance sits down to flip between its TV Shows, and see what is going on in the neighborhood, that is one show they will stop on, and any gathering of those guys will get watched and listened to very closely.
Today, it is even easier for the modern day Stasi. You would think it would be harder with everyone having houses. Surely they can’t break into all of them. But today, people bring the listening devices into the houses themselves. They have always been able to activate the microphones of unused telephones in rooms, even the old rotary dialers that were hard-wired into copper lines on the telephone poles, even while they were hung up.
But today, everything is wired into the internet and has microphones. I have four cell phones in the room I am in right now. Voice-controlled thermostats, TV remote controls, smart TV’s. web cameras on laptops and desktops, Onstar-like services in cars, baby monitors, security camera systems, Ring doorbells, and on and on throughout the Internet of Things.
People bring these things into their houses, and then don’t tape over the lenses of the cameras on the TVs pointing at their beds, or recognize the microphone can be turned on remotely, and then they hook it up to the internet themselves, giving it their WiFi password.
People even get Alexas and put them in every room, connected to the internet, so they can ask questions. Every one of those devices has a mic and is wired to the internet, and it can be turned on without anyone knowing.
Do you think the old Stasi would have turned those mics on? Are the governments of the West so much better today? You see in the book, the surveillance is everywhere. And you can see by the increasing numbers of people reporting “Gangstalking” that these intelligence services have turned fully criminal and oppressive in the shadows, just like the old Stasi.
Even though they may not be overtly harassing you for expedience, they are definitely still out there, and there will be a local archivist assigned to you, who is actively maintaining your file with extremely intimate, sensitive data you think nobody could possibly know.
And for the rare case of a luddite who does not have any such tech, there are technologies, from lasers which bounce off windows, to microwave and radar devices which penetrate into the interiors of homes, to sound triangulation devices utilizing multiple microphones and geophones to isolate sound from a particular point, using principles like are used in GPS, for them to listen in those houses as well. Or they will just break in, in those cases, like the old Stasi, and install what they want. For them it is as simple as filling out a form to get the team in.
So they listen in everyone’s home – and I have seen the evidence. When you end up under hostile surveillance, they initially try to launch a “shock and awe” campaign to cow you, by showing you how many citizen-informants have signed up for the type of vehicular duty you see above (somewhere between 4% and 10% of the population works for them part-time, and will follow you and turn on you, everywhere you go.).
As part of the shock and awe, they will show you they are listening in your house, by setting cars up just out of sight of your house, and when they hear you disparage the surveillance in conversations in your home, those cars will move, and suddenly you have car after car driving in front of your house, revving engines, honking horns, yelling, spinning tires, dropping plows, or any of a myriad of other loud-noise-making actions. Comment on that, and suddenly even more appear doing it even louder.
In the home I resided in, it was far enough from all other houses, with heavy woods in between to boot, that there was no way they heard those conversations from a neighbor’s house, without backdooring some form of tech in my house. And I am not a criminal, nor did I associate with any. There was no possible way they could have petitioned any judge to get a warrant to listen in my house. It was fully illegal, and from what I have seen since, that is just standard operating procedure, and they do it with everyone.
And the civilians do not just drive around, or listen in houses. From following you through grocery stores to catalog what you buy, to actually dating and sleeping with targets to get better information, they operate as full-fledged junior spies.
They are desperately trying to find out where anyone might be aspiring, so the machine can come in and kill those aspirations, put the target back on the treadmill of life, and the conspiracy will not have to worry they might one day rise up high enough to see all this criminality at the top.
Here, I would be shocked if these guys did not hit a bar after a day spent jumping, and a trio of hot babes came in, struck up a conversation, and at least one of the girls ended up “dating” one of the guys, to get better intel on them.
I have seen this technique too, and if you ever encounter it, the hallmark of it will be the sense you get in the back of your head that it is way too easy. If, however, you do not know this is out there, it is easy to just think you have gotten incredibly lucky. But the truth is. if you get that, it will mean you have become a target, and that girl is there to take you down in some fashion.
This is how it works in the US, where our elections are rigged, our treasury was being raided, both by all the criminals in elected office and in neighboring NGOs, and where our intelligence services have been turned more against the regular citizen, than any foreign enemy.
This state of affairs does come with an advantage, however. The surveillance is the big secret. Nobody in it is allowed to talk about it. You can use that to smoke out its agents.
If you show this website to the head of your militia, and he denies there is any sense to any of this, you have just found a planted agent. If you raise it with a law enforcement officer of any sort, and they deny it is possible, you just found a dirty cop who works for the Stasi within his department.
Looking for a political influencer to follow? If they do not point you to this, or they deny this is possible, then they are a controlled asset trying to keep you under the machine’s thought-control. This knowledge is the best way to smoke out their infiltrators, as none are allowed to talk about it.
I am an American who believes in the myths I was told about some ethereal document called the Constitution, and I am blindly loyal to my fellow real Americans, who honor their loyalties to that document, to each other, and to all of our freedoms. Like many Founders, I believe revolution, and the destruction of government, is a healthy phase of our society.
But you see from this piece, nobody can operate now, nor will they be able to when it is time. Any operation launched against the government is destined to either fail before it even begins, or to be used by the machine for its own ends, as 9/11, which there is no doubt the surveillance saw coming, was.
Any revolution will fail, under a swarm of infiltrators sent in, bad luck, unfortunate coincidences, or outright ambush. So long as the criminals in the American Stasi are operating, every American is a powerless slave, with no hope of ever getting free.
If you are ever to be free in this nation, every reader of this piece absolutely has to spread it to everyone, pull everybody to this website, and the book made free on it, and make everyone aware of the surveillance. Whether the government takes it down willingly, or a hot conflict is opened up and everyone in it is driven from the nation, is no matter.
The surveillance must go, if liberty in America is ever to have any chance. Please join me in this fight.
