Many people do not understand 9/11 conspiracy theorizing. or even skepticism. I certainly did not, until I saw the extent of the surveillance deployed everywhere, in an operational structure designed to have each local unit know everyone in their sector, be able to review the background of everyone visiting their sector, and to initiate more aggressive surveillance on anyone who was not well-known in their files.
As an example, if I pull into a random neighborhood at 3AM, the local monitor will hear my arrival via microphones deployed on telephone poles, on neighborhood surveillance operative’s houses, and even on cars local operatives will park on the streets. Those microphones feed into the homes of the monitors assigned to the neighborhood, connecting them in real time to, and alerting them of, any unusual activity in their sector.
My arrival at that hour will be unusual, and instantly noted. The local monitor will have the capability to see where I came from, what file my local units assembled on me, and they will probably have a pretty good idea of who I have come to visit and what I am up to. If they do not, there are local resources roving in the town, (vehicular, foot, and technical), which they can draw upon to get a closer look and find out.
The idea there would be such ultra-granular monitoring of the environment in the United States, to where you do not pull into a side-street without a monitor assigned to the area noticing, will seem strange and outlandish to those who have never seen the operation.
But again, the front page of this website shows video which demonstrates the operation employs children as spies, and runs them against fellow Americans. By comparison, the deployment of pole tech, and assigning someone to monitor their neighborhood late at night, looking at who is going where and why, is seen as the most basic of measures to the modern, technology-driven domestic surveillance all throughout the West.
In that context, I knew when Mohammed Atta first arrived in the US, and headed somewhere to lay his head after his international flight, he arrived in one of the surveillance-sectors in the United States. Unlike you or me, when his local monitor went to pull his file, (assuming he was not an outright CIA asset), they would realize he came from an international flight, and he had no background file.
That is very unusual, and he would immediately have a team of locals assigned to him to do incredibly detailed surveillance on him, capturing everything, and using it to create a background file which would reveal not just what he was here for, but who he was as a person, what he believed in, what motivated him, what he opposed, and what he would do in the future.
People without files in the US are vanishingly rare, and need only be noticed for the first time, to have a file begun. As an unknown, he would get the same treatment I get as a dissident, minus the harassing aspects. And before long, the surveillance would know every word he whispered, every call he made, and where every penny he was living off of was coming from.
In short, because I know about the ground surveillance in the US, I know there is zero probability you look at Mohammed Atta’s case, and see him slip through the surveillance “cracks,” because there are no cracks. Multiply his case by 19 hijackers, and there is no way the hijackings were unknown to the Intelligence Community when they happened. All of those hijackers would have been given tier-one level surveillance, simply for being unknowns with no files. And once their intentions were identified, they would get even more experienced teams with even more assets assigned to them.
Others have become skeptical of the 9/11 backstory via other pathways.
It is an interesting interview, featuring a number of familiar themes, including the American Secret Police – the “American Stasi” – using the FBI to drive an honest man out of Congress with entirely bogus, harassing investigations, lying in the War On Terror and attacking the wrong countries solely for profit, and a Congressman openly saying he believes the CIA killed two of his friends with a cancer-causing virus.
Among former Congressman Weldon’s reasons for skepticism over the official story about 9/11 there was this:
Tucker Carlson : There is a sense that is pretty obvious, I mean why is anything from 9/11 still classified? It is our country. It happened to 3,000 of our fellow Americans. We have an absolute right to know what happened. There is not even a question, I mean it was almost 25 years ago, so spare me your lectures about national security…
By the way, I never questioned anything about 9/11, and I actively attacked people who did. I am ashamed of that, but that is a fact. I did it on tape, more than once. Because my feeling was, that is devisive, or whatever. I was a child and an idiot.
But what began to make me wonder – and I have no idea what happened on 9/11, but it is very clear that there is a lot of lying around it – was the collapse of Building Seven.
And all the whackos would be like, “Building Seven! Building Seven!,” and you would be like, “Shut up whackos!” And then if you just sort of look at it, you are like, “Well that is very weird, actually. No plane hit that building, and [he mimes the building falling straight down in place]…” Does this happen a lot when buildings catch fire?
Former Congressman Weldon: Besides being a firefighter, I worked for INA, the largest insurance company in North America. I was responsible for training their fire protection/arson people for eighteen years. That doesn’t happen. You never have a 47 story building just collapse on itself, which this did. And even Donald Trump – I have a tape of him speaking on 9/11 and Donald Trump, in his own words says, “That was controlled demolition.”
And this:
Tucker Carlson: From an engineering perspective, like, you had three buildings come down, sort of collapse in on themselves – implode, it looked like – and a lot of people have said – many credible, non-crazy people have said, that was controlled demolition. Was it?
Former Congressman Weldon: When I got up there, the day after, I had been in the Trade Center, at the restaurant at the top several times. There is no way those two buildings could have collapsed into what they were there. Something had to happen.
Tucker Carson: Was that obvious to you immediately?
Former Congressman Weldon: Yes, Absolutely. And they were looking for the firefighters like Ray Downy, and the 342 there, who were trapped, and eventually vaporized. So something happened.
There is a high explosive material, I think it is called Thermite, that is used to explode metal and steel, and vaporize it. Those tests were never done on that. There were some limited tests which found there was some evidence of that.
But the whole thing never was subjected to the kind of investigation that would be warranted when 3,000 people die.
I mean when you have 3,000 people die, you would think it would be a full, massive investigation, not just going after 9/11, obviously. But what happened to the buildings and why did they come down?
They are the only high rise buildings in the world that have ever come down from an airplane hitting them. And those buildings, I read the report from the architect who designed them. They were designed to withstand an airplane hitting the building, and standing tall.
Tucker Carlson: And especially Building Seven, which had no plane hit it, right?
Former Congressman Weldon: No plane hit it, and the building just, you can see it when you watch it on TV, it just implodes straight down.
But the most interesting part for our purposes here was this:
Former Congressman Weldon: What really got me again was Orio Palmer, the Battalion Chief… Orio Palmer was one of the most inspirational Battalion Chiefs in the New York FDNY.., very good shape, had a family, a couple of kids.
One of the buildings, as soon as they got on the scene, he took the elevator up to the 40th floor, got off the elevator, and you could hear him on the comm system say, “I’m here, 40th floor, we are going to start walking up the stairwells.” Every five floors he radios back to communications, “I am on the 50th floor, everything is OK,” “We are on floor 60, everything is OK.”
He is going up, every so many floors, he gives a report. He reaches the 78th floor, the floor of the impact. He comes out of the stair tower, and as clear as you listening to me, here… he says, “We’re on 78, the floor of impact. We’ve got two fires, and we can handle them.”
One minute later, the whole building collapses. That is not normal. That is not acceptable. That is not what happens. It’s on tape.
Again, surveillance operations, and intelligence operations are, by their nature, designed to evade detection, by appearing as if due to normal chance.
In my experience, the only way you can detect the most sophisticated operations is by coincidences in timing. The cars which reliably appear at the intersection just as you do to call a direction of travel at the intersection, after long lonesome stretches of empty road. The walker who happens by just as you enter an obscured sightline.
Something happens, the surveillance would need eyes on you, and just at that moment, up pops a person with a sightline to you. Some unlikely event needs to happen at a specific time for an operation to succeed, and it happens, just when it needs to.
If surveillance and intelligence is not present, these events can still happen. Here and there. Once in a while. When it happens over and over, when it happens reliably at such a precise moment, or when it happens, at exactly the right moment instead of a greater likelihood of it not happening, or it happening at the wrong moment, you begin to see your probabilities skew toward the presence of surveillance and intelligence.
The more precise the timing, the more it hits at the single moment which is just right, instead of a plethora of other moments which are not, the more you should begin to suspect the presence of intelligence and surveillance molding events from behind the scenes.
I have had no doubt, based on this extensive surveillance machine, they knew 9/11 was coming. The machine I see could not miss it. It was designed to not miss it. When I cannot whisper a word within my house which is not heard by my surveillance, when they freely invade the privacy of my house, when they freely beam me with the Havana impulse beam at night, I know a terrorist planning 9/11 would be detected immediately and get even more extensive coverage.
I have said there are worse possibilities, like 9/11 being a purposeful act engineered by our intelligence services to manipulate the public into giving the Intelligence Community more power. Clearly Congressman Weldon is implying he is leaning toward those worse probabilities being the case.
He does not expound on the significance of the timing here, but I will.
If the events of 9/11 were a planned operation, and the plan entailed dropping the buildings into their footprint, in a controlled demolition, with demolition charges placed on the superstructure to bring the towers down in controlled fashion, there would have to be a cover story. A cover story would be needed because it is unlikely Mohammed Atta and his team could get into the towers, and plant the explosives for a controlled collapse, especially after the 1993 bombing, and the enhanced security implemented thereafter.
What we saw, was that the cover story was, the fuel from the planes, as it burned, heated the steel structure of the building to the point it could no longer stand, and having given way at the impact site, it triggered a chain reaction which brought the entire building down.
It seemed strange neither building saw an asymmetrical failure which led to a leaning of the building, and a toppling to the side. Both buildings failing, and falling right into their footprint seemed odd.
As Tucker says, to then have Building Seven also collapse the same way, even without any plane hitting it is even more odd. But the events were shocking, the alternatives too traumatic to consider, and the cover story held, bolstered by main stream media stories telling us it all made sense.
What Congressman Weldon is implying, I believe, is that such a cover story required that the fires burn as long as possible, to produce maximum heating. What the cover story could not allow, would be for the FDNY to extinguish the blaze, and for cooling to occur. If the fire were put out, and then the buildings collapsed, it would be much more difficult to explain away. People would ask, “Why did the building not fail at its hottest?”
So there was an optimal window for the collapse, which would be just before efforts were undertaken to put it out. And what was seen was, the fire burned right until the FDNY Battalion Chief announced over the radio they were about to begin combatting it, and at that moment the building dropped.
There have been other troubling aspects to 9/11 as well. Here, CIA Officer Kevin Shipp notes that within the CIA, it is well known that numerous 9/11 hijackers were, in fact, CIA assets who reported to CIA handlers, and he implies as a CIA Officer, he does not want to think about the implications of that:
And of course there is the fifth plane, which failed to be hijacked, as there were too many planes on the tarmac ahead of it, waiting to take off, when the ground stop was ordered. The potential hijackers spotted on board by the flight crew were described, thusly, according to the article here (archive here, and here):
.. the four Arabs in first class were two men, a young boy and a woman in an enveloping burqa who all they believed was actually a man posing as a woman. The men were impatient to take off.
One flight attendant noted there was also a man in business class wearing a T-shirt and sweating profusely even though the plane was fully cooled.
That was not the most disturbing part of the article though. The most disturbing part was this:
The flight attendants also stated that after everyone was believed to have deplaned, it was discovered that the floor hatch behind the crew cabin, and under carpeting, had been opened – leading to an electronics compartment and another hatch that opens out on the underside of the plane. Mannello did not observe it, but speculated it may have been used by someone on the ground to enter the plane to retrieve weapons, like box-cutters.
Yet another flight attendant that day who was not on the program, recently contacted Florida Bulldog….
The flight attendant said that after the plane returned to the gate, and people began deplaning, she watched a passenger agent come on board and say, “We don’t know if there are bombs on board. We’re going to move these airplanes away from the gate so it doesn’t affect the terminal. The mechanic is going to come on board and drive the airplane, you know, away from the gate. I heard all that.”
The woman, who asked not to be named, said she and her colleagues searched the plane to make sure everyone was off and that no packages were left behind. She said the mechanic had entered the cockpit and she was the last crew member to step off the plane when she decided to go back to grab a bottle of water.
“The four [Arab] passengers in first class were gone. All passengers were gone, all crew members were gone. There was a mechanic in the cockpit and I stepped on alone,” the flight attendant said. “And at that moment, two men came out of hiding. They were on board our airplane, in the back galley,” she said. “They looked at me dead in the eye and turned their backs to me. Everything in me said run. I grabbed a bottle of water and I got off that airplane.”
The flight attendant said she doesn’t know how the two men came to be there. She doesn’t think they were United kitchen workers or mechanics. “I will tell you now, I’m convinced they were hiding in a meal cart.
“What I was told by an FBI person is that they came forward, the mechanic confronted them and when he said what are you doing, they pretended that they didn’t speak English. He went in the cockpit. He locked the door and called for security. They ripped the carpet up off the floor and opened to the wheel well, they went down through that, an electronic room. I thought it was a wheel well. I guess they have access to the wheel well, but it’s all the electronics there. And they escaped off the tarmac.”
Those were not regular Arab hijackers who had been hiding in a meal cart who had detailed knowledge of hatches hidden under carpet on jumbo jets and how to move through the hidden, maintenance sections of an airplane, and they were not there to retrieve weapons. I would assume the mechanic knew them, and opened the hatch to let them in.
It is impossible to say with certainty, but based on my experience with surveillance and intelligence, for going on ten years now, I would guess that was a CIA Office of Science and Technology team, or some similar unit from another agency, which boarded the aircraft to remove some sort of technology they had installed on board.
They probably had assumed the technology would be destroyed in any crash, and realized it had become a risk of exposure once the plane had failed to take off and destroy itself. So they were forced to get the plane to an isolated area at the airport and remove it themselves.
What the technology would do is up for speculation, but I would assume at the least it would transmit video and audio from within the cabin, so the hijacking could be monitored from an operations center in real time.
On the farther end of the spectrum it is conceivable if an intelligence operation had decided planes were going to crash into buildings, (as you would assume, if the two towers of the WTC were taken down in a controlled demolition by charges installed in the buildings themselves), then that intelligence operation would not leave the crashing of the planes into the buildings to chance.
If so, they might install some sort of remote-control mechanism on the planes, capable of taking control of them remotely. That would allow a professional pilot with more experience piloting that plane than the hijackers had, to guide the planes right into the towers.
Once the towers have explosives in them, once there is monitoring technology on the planes, once an operation like this begins leaving evidence of its presence behind in the form of installed technology, it becomes vital that the operation go as planned.
It is the plane crashes, the fires, and the collapses of the buildings which are being relied on to hide the presence of the intelligence operation by obliterating the technology it is using to monitor the progress of events.
As a result I do not think they would rely on a few poorly trained Arabs, with only some simulator time behind a yoke, to be able to guide a plane at 500 mph into the building, and not overshoot any measure, and, from the perspective of the intelligence operation, “God-forbid,” miss the building, or only clip it with a wing-tip, and suddenly leave behind all that evidence in the building and on the plane.
IMO, an intelligence operation would want a professional with thousands of flight-hours handling the last moments of the flights. Since I would doubt they would be on board the plane in those last moments, a remote control mechanism would seem the only logical alternative.
Regardless, the fact a plane suspected of being a fifth hijacked plane on 9/11 had some kind of covert intelligence team driving the plane to an isolated area at the airport, entering secretly through a belly hatch, and working on the plane before disappearing without a trace, would make me very suspicious the knowledge of, and control over the operations of 9/11 was far more extensive than anyone would have thought. There was something they needed to get off that plane.
If I were to bet money, I would assume there was even an operations center, complete with an operational commander responsible for making all final decisions in furtherance of the operational objectives, a team of specialists on computers ready to call up whatever technical measures the commander demanded, and a big screen on a wall, which featured live videos of the hijackings, all available surveillance assets at and around the target buildings, and cameras on scene which were being provided by the ground surveillance teams, as well as all radio traffic of first responders.
My guess would be they were looking at live news feeds from helicopters, of people clinging to the outside of the towers, when they heard Orio Palmer say his Battalion could handle the fires they encountered at the impact site, and were about to begin work.
I would guess within seconds the operational commander would have given the order to set off the charges which would bring the towers down, and then the entire operations center watched as the tower fell on the big screen.
As I have said, the surveillance operations we detail on these pages, which I have spent a lifetime dealing with, leave me with no doubt the Intelligence Community knew what was coming, and allowed it. In truth, I assume every surveillance person in the country – millions of Americans – the people following you through the grocery store and listening in your house to build your file, would have all looked at 9/11 and instantly known their command was somehow involved, given the control over the nation they helped it exert every single day.
And truth be told, there is a significant body of evidence pointing to the fact they may have had much more to do with those attacks than we would believe.
As I now, nightly, experience the technical harassment of thru-wall directed energy weapons, and as I see fellow Americans exposed to harassment operations similar to the old Zersetzung operations of East Germany, and as I have, in the past seen my surveillance revel in being allowed to bully and harass fellow Americans for no reason other than command told them to, I have come to conclude there is a population within America, chosen and favored by our intelligence community, which is unlike anything regular Americans can imagine.
And as I see Tucker promote all these concepts to the masses, I suspect we are in the midst of another group of Americans in the Intelligence Community purposely exposing this, almost certainly in an effort to destroy it.
Clearly I am not the only American who thinks the tactics of the old communist East Germany have no place in America. Nor should this country have within it, anyone who would inflict something like 9/11 on our nation.
I am sure this article’s content will be difficult for a lot of Americans, even the most ardent truth-seekers, to even contemplate. I know at age 35, I could never have even contemplated it, despite being open to almost any idea.
But I have seen the surveillance now for a long time. It is a hostile, occupying force which views regular Americans as some sort of threat and enemy. And once you see that, you will realize your picture of America, which you were raised with, which you loved, was not the whole picture. Sadly, we are no longer all one big team here.
If you really seek truth, you will eventually have to consider that this nation has had a self-destructive, evil cancer within her. From importing rapist migrants, to embezzling over four-fifths of our foreign aid, to seeking to place people like George Bush and Hillary Clinton in the highest office in the land through rigged elections, evil has been pushing the boundaries of late.
You are going to have to ask yourself, would that evil ever seek power over our intelligence community, and if it got it, and if it had nearly limitless resources, in terms of pilfered Treasury resources, what would it be capable of?
You should not be surprised if the answer is shocking.
If you are a truth seeker, I would suggest you may need to brace yourself for some shocking revelations, because I think, based on this being discussed this way now, some faction within the intelligence community intends to reveal the truth in the near future. And I have no doubt, the truth will be shocking.
