For those encountering one for the first time, these surveillance detection pieces require one first read the book American Stasi: The Domestic Surveillance Targeting You And Your Children. The book costs either $60 r $40, depending on whether you purchase the hard or softcover, or you can read it entirely for free, in even more convenient HTML format, with direct links to all sources at Americanstasi.com .
The book takes you, in Google Streetview, to Russia and Bulgaria, shows you the photos Google took of the Russian and Bulgarian surveillance teams tracking the Google Streetview car, and then it takes you to America, and shows you, using Google Streetview, and private surveillance camera footage, that there is an even bigger domestic surveillance operation, modeled on the East German Stasi, on the streets of America, patrolling all the time, and watching everyone, to build files on all of us, and limit our opportunities in life, so we can never rise high enough to challenge the criminals who control our government for power.
Here in these pieces, we show additional cases where this surveillance has been caught on camera, to hone the surveillance-awareness of our readers. These pieces may seem fanciful to you, but after taking the courses in the book American Stasi, and learning surveillance detection in the courses it contains, you will see what we are showing you here – and the world, and America, will never look the same to you again.
Now, the piece:
Our elections are rife with tampering, and I suspect the rigging is such that for some time now, the outcomes were almost completely pre-determined. There is nothing partisan about it. It is not Democrats, nor is it Republicans. It is not liberals or conservatives. Our nations have been taken over by a shadow dictatorship, which is run by our intelligence services, who I assume really do not care whether the country seems to be left or right.
All they really want is access to the treasury, and forever wars continually going on overseas to pour money into the defense contractors they own. If you think otherwise, it is my opinion you are just too good a person for this world.
There was a recent story, where a citizen walking outside Edina City Hall noticed a minivan left unattended, its tailgate raised, and in the back, vulnerable to theft or tampering, were boxes of ballots.
Here is an interesting surveillance video from the town hall of the minivan left unattended. There are three possible explanations for what occurs in this video. One is, an innocent citizen, who for some reason was sitting in the parking lot in their car, doing nothing, noticed the ballots left unattended, and in taking action to remedy that, they triggered a swarm from the American Stasi’s surveillance operation, which for some reason was shadowing the minivan.
The other possibility is you have two competing surveillance operations in this video, which bumped into each other. It is even possible somebody sent the older guy in to disrupt something the American Stasi had planned here. They certainly panicked when he leapt into action.
Here is the video, below. Stills will follow, with explanations for what I believe, based on my extensive experience with the American Stasi, is what you are seeing.
As the minivan is heading to its parking spot below (oddly enough a handicapped spot), the posted parking lot surveillance vehicle, which was cooling its heels at the very top of the screen, at the far edge of the lot, (here designated by the yellow arrow), picks up and moves out, exiting the lot. There is no reason to park all that ways away. You are not running across the main drag over there to some store on the other side of the road, and you will notice all the other cars which park in this piece, do so closer to the entrance to the city hall, off the bottom right side of the image. He is out there to get a sightline to the entrance to the lot, off the right side of the picture, and to keep an eye on things generally, without anyone noticing him in his car, sitting there all day.
I get the impression sometimes surveillance does not want too many units in one place however, and it will move locals out of an area if a priority target, with a first-rate team assigned, is coming through. But remember the parking spot, it will come up later, a couple of times.
Below, a second vehicle pulls in and parks next to the minivan, in another handicapped parking spot. You cannot say this is definitely surveillance, as it could have happened innocently, obviously. Two cars, parking in handicapped parking spots is not impossible. However the timing is curious – just as the minivan parks, a second car just happens to park too? Both handicapped vehicles? What percentage of cars use handicapped spots? As a target, I have also noted that when a target changes momentum, coming to a stop, or beginning to move, surveillance requires one of their people be there, to confirm the change in momentum has completed. This can be when you exit your house, enter your house, when you pull out of your driveway, or arrive home, when you arrive at a destination parking spot, pull away from a destination parking spot, as you enter a destination building on foot, or as you are exiting it to begin your trip home. All are critical points in a trip which are watched closely.
Additionally, it is surveillance procedure to never try to avoid a target’s ability to observe you when in sight of the target, and indeed, to do the opposite, and actually get close to the target, and allow the target to make detailed observations, I assume based off an assumption that such behavior is seen as the opposite of suspicious. So if surveillance were to send someone to confirm this target’s change of momentum, you would expect them to park right next to the target.
The courier who left the minivan unattended exits the lower part of the screen at 1:43 below:
Here below, is where he parked (yellow arrow), and where he was likely walking to, (blue arrow), from a different angle. When you are under coverage, the surveillance will try to have people walk out of buildings as you walk in, and walk in as you walk out. I assume they are confirming you completed the act of changing environments, but regardless, it is a procedure you will see them adhere to quite rigidly.
Now here, at 2:13, someone who exited the building just as the courier entered, walks into the surveillance camera frame:
That would increase the probability the courier was under surveillance. Here you are getting into a more advanced level of surveillance detection. Before you were just looking for unlikely events. As you begin to see the surveillance, as you begin to observe its procedures, and see how it operates, you do not just have to look for random events. You can then begin to look for a statistically improbable adherence to surveillance procedure-events. You park, an observer is present. You enter a building, someone is coming out. You exit the building, someone is coming in. You reach your car, someone is there to observe. You go to pull out, cars are driving by. You reach a point where you could have an unobserved contact with a randomized stranger and surveillance sends in an observer.
When you are not expecting surveillance, as most are not in the US, all of that can happen, all of the time, and it will mean nothing to the target. “How could it be surveillance? Nobody would stoop so low as to work for the government, which we all know has to remain limited, in such a capacity! What kind of deviant would volunteer to spy on regular fellow citizens for “the government?! Nobody would do it.”
Unfortunately, part of this process involves finding out a large number of your fellow citizens did not extend you the same level of loyalty and respect for your privacy that you extended to them, without thought.
As you learn to see it, you will begin seeing it around you, because if you have stumbled on this material, and are the type of psychology to find it interesting, the surveillance is so extensive and thorough, it most likely identified this about you decades ago, and it has been watching you closely, having years back flagged you as a potential threat, and assigned you additional surveillance coverage for the duration of your life.
It sounds nuts, you would say it cannot be like this in America, but all I can say is we have thrown way too much money at our intelligence agencies, and our elected representatives have abandoned any pretense of oversight of them ages ago. In addition the government has become so rife with criminality, all of the scumbags in it supported the operation of this surveillance because its overwatch is all that stands between them and a lifetime spent in prison for treason. As a result, they clamped down this level of control over the society, almost without thought.
A second woman enters the frame at 2:19, walking quite some distance behind the male.
What is curious is she and the male walk to the same car, enter it and leave, however they are walking roughly 20 feet apart. If I was walking with my girl to the car, we are walking side by side, as a sort of team. If she encountered a problem or a threat, I am right there, and if I am with her, I would be with her because I liked her company. Walking with her 20 feet behind me all the time would feel weird, and require we consciously split up at the outset of our movement, one of us walking off, and the other holding position to create the distance artificially before following 20 feet behind.
It is a benefit of seeing surveillance, which is designed to look normal to the target, from the perspective of surveillance camera footage. The target, the courier, saw a man walking out the front door as he approached, and 20 feet behind, maybe just as he entered the building, a woman walked by. To him that would appear entirely normal. The camera, however, sees the man and woman both enter the same car, meaning they are a couple, which is weird from that perspective.
Were she or I dealing with somebody in City Hall, it would almost require one of us conclude our business, leave, and the other remain behind for ten or fifteen seconds waiting, before beginning our movement, so as to purposely create distance between us. It makes no sense as a normal couple moving. However, if surveillance wanted to make sure a door had someone in proximity to it for 30 or 40 seconds, splitting a couple and having them move with that type of distance between them would make perfect sense.
Now one of the strange things about surveillance. For some reason, surveillance often experiences the same surveillance the target experiences at destinations. Perhaps the surveillance assigned to the area surveils everyone in the area, regardless of whether they are surveillance or not, just to be sure they get the right target. Perhaps a time or two in the past, surveillance entered a sector, called in the local team, and in the after-op debrief they were all chagrined to find the local team only has imagery of other surveillance cars, and it had missed the target vehicle. Or, alternatively, they perform surveillance procedures on their own people so a third party operation observing them, will have difficulty discerning who everyone is.
If only the target is experiencing surveillance-related events around them and couples like this are just walking off untargeted, then whether it be a hostile surveillance operation on the ground watching the scene, or Russians reviewing satellite footage from overhead, it will be crystal clear who all the players are at any moment. If, however, even the surveillance operatives are getting the exact same procedures as the target, then a third party happening on this scene will have trouble discerning who is the surveillance, and who is the target. So when a target is in an area, you will see surveillance around them. And then, you will also tend to notice surveillance placed on the surveillance. It is, from what I see, procedure.
As an example, if you have a neighborhood observation post next door, every time it sends cars out to rove and patrol, and conduct follows, those surveillance cars leaving its driveway will precipitate the same surveillance drive-bys, which you see applied to you, every time you depart your home.
My neighbors are all surveillance at one residence I live at. When I am going out or coming into my driveway, just as I depart my driveway, there will be a swarm of cars going in both directions on that otherwise empty road, and as I am arriving home, the spot in front of my driveway will again become a swarm of passing vehicles. Then, when I watch my surveillance cameras, I will see my neighbor’s departures and arrivals, or even just their working in their front yard, will precipitate the same swarms of surveillance traffic mine do.
I do not know why they waste resources on surveilling their own units, but they do. Perhaps it is training, or perhaps whoever is in the central control room feels more in control if they are watching their own people who are providing them video, so they can tell them to drive closer, or slow their approach to delay their arrival, or speed up to get there faster.
Regardless, the girl who exited the building as the courier was entering, enters her car at 2:47 (yellow arrow), and immediately a vehicular surveillance unit performs a drive-by (red circle). I do not see how that advances any mission objective, however I know they do it for some reason, and I see it as one more indicator the American Stasi is operative in that lot.
As I said a change in momentum of the target will precipitate a close pass, either by vehicular or foot. Above, the two secondary targets were ceasing movement as they got in the car, and so silver sedan did a close drive-by to confirm the change in momentum happened.
Below, another change of momentum is about to occur, as the two targets (themselves likely foot surveillance, IMO) begin to drive in their car. Sure enough, at 3:04, just as their car begins rearward movement, a black sedan, coming from the opposite direction as the silver sedan, passes right behind them just as they begin to move:
These are procedures which surveillance is taught and then practices as they rove around town looking for anything strange.
So we have gone for three minutes after the primary target, the ballot courier landed here, and there was no real traffic of note until this car began to exit and you get two surveillance vehicles going in opposite directions. I assume this is a sleepy little town hall, with nothing else in this complex and just a couple of small parking areas to handle the staff and occasional visitors, as seen in the photo below.
The camera is roughly where that red marker is, pointing to the right. You can see the handicapped spots where the courier parks under the words “City Hall.” Nobody ever really visits their town hall, so I assume if you could stop here randomly throughout the day, it usually looks like this, with nobody coming or going, except for the workers, and an odd citizen here or there. You will see as this piece goes on, and cars begin swinging through this lot, how traffic picks up.
For now, the target just landed, and command is busy looking at the overhead and posting units, called “box positions,” in positions with sightlines to all possible exits. Those box positions are designed to “box” the target in and make sure the target cannot leave without being seen and the team receiving notice.
Then additional units will be staged some distance away, for all directions, around each box position, each unit ready to pick up the target and follow them, (or more likely lead them), no matter what direction they head, should they exit suddenly, and a box position calls it.
Additionally, this weird Stasi civilian surveillance will have to interface with what I believe I have seen now at most government buildings, which is some kind of foot surveillance, and static vehicular surveillance, deployed around it, I assume federal law enforcement of some sort, which just tries to loiter or rove under some form of civilian cover, looking for anything unusual around the building, probably related to terrorism-fears.
Although a Fantasy Camp operation, as I call it, where people play the role of law enforcement, but are helpless to stop any real terrorism or mass shooter should the American Stasi bring one to bear on it, it seems to have been deployed just to make those unaware of the Stasi feel better, as if they are doing something.
Regardless, it can get in the way of these real intelligence operations tracking political stuff, and I assume whatever is running the follow of this courier will have to do something to either get it out of the way, or coordinate it with this follow of the courier, probably telling it the courier is of some interest to some law enforcement operation. Of course they would say the same thing were I to visit this building, and law enforcement would have zero interest in me, so nothing is real in this world of surveillance, beyond whether the lie you tell gets you what you want or not.
After a few minutes, once the perimeter is secured, and the operation is on the same page with federal building surveillance, more units will get positioned and staged, ready to do drive-bys of events of significance in the lot. Foot units which have day jobs working within the building will be called up, probably using the American Stasi App on their phones, and they will be sent to staged positions to do walk-bys. Other foot units may be dropped off, even in the back of the building, where they will sneak in and take up positions around the exits and entrances, and the whole area will get set up so if anything happens, anywhere, units can pop up, looking as if by chance, pass by close, and report on it first hand.
It seems like a lot of work and a massive waste of resources, just to track this courier, and I agree. I can only tell you, as you see the traffic here pick up when an event of significance occurs in a moment, you will understand, this is why we are the greatest nation on the earth, we are the most technologically advanced, we have the most capable citizenry, we produce the best stuff, yet everybody works like a slave with no vacations and spends their life on the balls of their ass financially, barely able to afford a home. Here is where your tax dollars go, into this bullshit, which is monitoring each and every one of us, so the assholes at the top can raid the treasury and steal your hard work, and not worry somebody will find out and oppose them one day. This is what you spend your life working for.
Now the real puzzler, and I am not entirely sure what this is. At 3:58, an old guy, represented by the blue arrow, exits his truck, in which he has been quietly sitting for the duration of the video, having been there when the minivan first arrived. He wasn’t doing anything, except sitting in the parking lot of the town hall.
That is typically behavior you would associate with parking lot surveillance. Consistent with that, as he opens his door to exit, he gets a drive-by from a vehicular unit, designated by the yellow arrow, which perfectly times its drive-by to his exit. At this point he could just be American Stasi parking lot surveillance assigned to this lot, supporting the operation targeting the courier.
But then he (blue arrow) gets more than just that normal surveillance which the operation does to itself in the course of operations. It begins to look like the Stasi surveillance views him as a threat. As the parking lot sitter continues his movement, he precipitates two walkers here, represented by the green arrow on the right, as the drive-by exits the scene on the left:
I suspect maybe the town PD was running its own surveillance here in this lot, posting somebody here just in case something happened, and this was something beyond the normal surveillance at all government buildings. Maybe the Stasi failed to coordinate with him (ie., order him to leave and let them do their thing). Now he is operational, checking out something unusual, and they have a competing surveillance operation looking over their target.
Below, he (blue arrow) pauses, to look in the back of the open minivan, at all the boxes of ballots. The two walkers (two green arrows) have stopped on each side of their car, and they may be watching exactly what he is doing, before getting in. They may not know if he is surveillance, and they may be looking to see if he grabs boxes of ballots and runs. It is very much like the first foot unit with the torso0-dumper in our book, stopping for a moment to look closely at the target, before continuing on.
Now another vehicle will pull into the same spot at the top of the screen (yellow arrow below) as the assigned posted unit for this lot, at the beginning of the piece, which had first picked up and left as the target entered. This driver will just sit there, on the far side of the lot, away from everything. I am wondering if this guy called him back to watch the lot while he went inside to sort out the car with its back left open.
Within seconds, two vehicles swoop into the scene, each coming from opposite directions, represented by the red and yellow arrows. Our walker, obscured by trees, and represented by the blue arrow, has paused to take a picture of the minivan. I suspect that is what later went viral online, indicating to me our walker is a patriot who genuinely cares, and was not American Stasi-associated:
White pickup stops cold and loiters below, as the two previous walkers begin to pull out from a parking spot in their car ahead of him. Creating accidental traffic jams to facilitate loitering is SOP for American Stasi vehicular surveillance, as the torso-dumper in chapter 19 of our book demonstrated. However, white pickup is not there to park and drives off with them. So he was not there to park. He entered the lot on one side, drove through, and exited on the other.
Lots of cars will do that before this is over. Were these cars not doing this, they would be arrayed all around town, roving, looking, and periodically getting assigned to you for a few days, to follow you and polish your file in the conspiracy’s archives, where we all have files, and have all been followed in person by these characters, for at least a few days, every so often:
Two more walkers enter the picture below here. Impossible to know if they are surveillance, though if this is a swarm, their timing would be indicative:
Additionally, a white SUV swings in and parks as close to the minivan as possible, in a handicapped spot as well. We are beginning to run out of handicapped spots, all of a sudden, in this sleepy little town hall parking lot:
Then another white SUV, and another pedestrian:
There is then a brief maybe 12 second lull at six minutes, which might represent the fact you just saw the unit assigned to a nearby sector rush to the area to swarm, and they have exhausted their assets.
Following the brief lull, you have another rush, which I would assume is the team assigned to another, slightly more distant sector arriving on scene. Here, about 25 seconds after the lull, you have two dog-walkers and five new cars. Remember, the first three minutes, there were no cars driving through this lot. This is a surveillance swarm:
Remember, all of this activity which has popped up so suddenly, is happening at this small town hall facility, pictured from above here:
And the vast majority are not parking in the parking lot, but rather they are driving in one entrance, and driving through, and exiting the other side.
Then at 7:09 this pickup truck pulls out, however the people in the truck had entered it at 5:01, after entering the scene just as the first swarm began. So for two minutes, those people were just sitting in the truck doing nothing.
I have said before, Standard Operating Procedure for surveillance following a target is to focus on the target’s destination first, identify it, and get there before the target can.
When the courier arrived, the nearest handicapped spot was already occupied. That would make you rule out the driver of that vehicle as surveillance, if you thought normally, which is why that vehicle would almost certainly have been surveillance. They identified that the courier used the handicapped spaces closest to their entrances of buildings whenever they parked, and by taking that space, the courier would almost certainly park next to the surveillance vehicle, which probably had hidden cameras, microphones, and other tech in it which central control could use to keep an eye on the target’s ride.
Notice, the driver of that vehicle returns to their vehicle just before the courier returns to their vehicle, with the picture below, showing his return, taken at 8:02:
He then stood on the sidewalk, through the courier’s arrival, at 8:05:
He stands on the sidewalk, digging through his pockets, until he finally moves to his car door. At 8:40, if you blow it up, before opening his door, he peeks at the courier over the top of his car:
He will steal another peek, after opening the door, just before getting in:
The courier returned to the minivan at about 8:15, and aside from a couple of cars which drove by just as he returned, traffic from that point drops off considerably for another brief lull. During this period, old handicapped car guy has “command” of the target and is waiting to call his departure.
For some reason, the courier does not depart, and finally, at 10:24, handicapped car guy is forced to leave to not appear too suspicious by loitering too long.
Of course, just as he pulls out, a drive-by pulls up, and he is forced to loiter further:
He then pulls behind, and slightly off to the right of the courier minivan, in its passenger-side blind spot, parks, and sits there for another 17 seconds:
He then pulls away, and as he does, two vehicles come from each side, perfectly timed to his picking up and moving:
14:24, another pull-out from a parking space:
And another perfectly timed drive-by:
These things happen so reliably and perfectly timed because they are a procedure. There will be no cars for extended periods, however at the critical moment, one will reliably appear.
Here is the guy parked on the other side of the courier, returning to his car. He had followed the courier in and parked immediately after him.
He is about to pull out of the parking space and change momentum, and there is a black SUV behind him, driving by:
He is about to pull away, another car leads him out:
And most of these cars are just pulling in one side of the lot, creeping through it, and pulling out the other, despite this facility having a looping road around it which they could drive much faster on.
At 16:30, the end car in the line of handicapped spots pulls away. The driver had walked out behind the driver of the silver sedan above, but took longer to leave.
She did not get a drive-by, but I think the reason was, she sat there until local parking lot surveillance guy, who photographed the open back of the truck with the ballots, exited the building, heading to his truck.
I think they pulled surveillance back to a minimal level when he came out, to hide from him. He might be trained and more surveillance aware, and so they don’t want him to see them. He still gets a drive-by when he reaches his truck though:
They park and go in.
He pulls out, and I think the command unit or “eye” who called both his departure, and that of the courier, who finally pulled out, was this woman, who occupied the final vehicle left in the handicapped lot:
So, an 18 minute and 46 second video, and during that period, there is a single vehicle, likely surveillance which had just arrived, in the handicapped lot when the target vehicle arrived, and in under 19 minutes, the handicapped lot entirely filled up, and then emptied, leaving a single vehicle in the lot which left right after the target. And of course the handicapped lot is empty in the overhead, the Google 3D image, and as you will see, the Streetview driveby. Additionally, only the driver of the nearest car in that lot really looked handicapped, and I am not sure he wasn’t faking debility just to loiter. Everyone else appeared to be moving fine.
It is also worth noting, if you counted, 46 vehicles moved in the lot, either driving through, entering and parking, or picking up and driving out, in that video, counting the target vehicle. If the video had run `a full 20 minutes, the final SUV in the handicapped lot would have pulled out, making it 47 vehicles. In 20 minutes. Times 3, that would be 141 vehicles moving in that lot per hour. Do you think in an average 10 hour day that lot has 141o vehicles pass through it normally outside of the employees, just for that little town hall?
If there was only one person per vehicle (and many had two people walk to it or come from it), only one person per car would work out to 1/37th of the population of all of Edina (pop. 53.494) every day. Or was traffic in that video, maybe, elevated above normal, for that short period, while the courier was there?
It is not a real surveillance detection piece until there is Google Streetview imagery, so we will take a quick spin through that parking lot, just to see what we see.
The first thing I would note is in the earliest timeline, November of 2016, there was sufficient security concerns for the safety of the building that someone had placed a temporary, emergency Eye of God pan tilt zoom security camera monitor in the parking lot.
That thing is not hardwired, or solar – its battery-powered, and wireless, which requires considerable power to transmit all that digital data. So somebody was coming each night or two and swapping out the batteries, or towing it off for charging and replacing it with a freshly charged unit.
Second, those are pan/tilt/zoom cameras on it:
The significance of that is, the pan, tilt, and zoom functions are only able to be utilized live, which means if the features are on the camera, then you have an operator somewhere, monitoring them live, who is capable of utilizing the pan, tilt, and zoom functions. So even back then, this lot had live eyes-on, monitoring for the approach of threats.
Would you have felt watched and scrutinized, the moment you entered the lot back then, to stop by the records office and get a copy of your deed? Do you think they one day chose to abandon the security afforded by those live eyes, or do you think they simply transitioned to a more discrete form of live eyes, in the form of the surveillance you just saw?
In addition to the camera, you have this walker, who spends several photos just standing by their car, futzing in their pocket for their keys:
By the time you are pulling out, they are still standing there, not getting into their car, or even opening the door:
I can tell you, that is surveillance. I cannot say exactly why, but once you see this pattern often enough you will begin to recognize it as well.
Moving to the latest timeline, June of 2023, there was a construction project which closed one entrance, meaning surveillance would realize all traffic entering the lot would be bottlenecked at the sole remaining entrance. It would be likely a car with a sightline to that entrance would get a parking lot sitter to clock entrants to the parking lot, most likely local fantasy camp surveillance, in addition to the regular American Stasi surveillance which comes with the Google car.
Here is what you see as you enter the lot.
Can you tell where the surveillance is? I will give you a hint. He is in a vehicle with his back to you, and he has adjusted his rear-view passenger widow to let him see you without you seeing him. I am just kidding, all you can se here is his passenger window, and you would never notice the operator inside. To see him, you have to look in the lot as you drive along the edge of it, approaching the entrance:
That is your classic surveillance parking lot sitter, positioned with the back of the vehicle pointed toward the target in such a way he can use his side mirror for observations, which allows him to see you as you enter, but which conceals him from you. You will note he is also roughly in a line with the first vehicle to pick up and leave the parking lot in the courier video. That first vehicle was probably also an entrance-watcher.
When you get in the lot, you will note, all of the handicapped spots are empty, indicating that they probably do not normally see much use.
Again, not absolutely dispositive of the fact that what you saw on the ballot courier video was definitely surveillance, but as I have said, surveillance detection is about the growing confluence of small probabilities which just keep playing out the same way, despite the fact eventually you would expect them to diverge from what you continuously see. In the video, the lot went from completely empty to completely full once the courier arrived, and returned to completely empty once he left, and every other time we can check, it was completely empty.
If you are sharp, you will notice that is the parking spot right next to the one the old guy who got out and photographed the ballots was sitting in, and she too has parked nose-in so her observations are made using her mirrors, and she is concealed from the targets behind her. It probably offers the best sightline to the front doors, and is among the least obvious to passer-bys, so every shift takes up their station in that position.
I have told you, you have no idea, as you go about your day, how many times a surveillance person is watching you and clocking what you are up to, and a note is going in the master record. It is everywhere, it is intrusive, and it is personal. It is also a huge waste of resources.
It was apparently fairly cool there, when these photos were taken. In hotter climates, you would see them open their doors, and try to get as far out of the car as they could, into the cool air. You have seen that in the book, in Russia, in Bulgaria, and even in southern California.
The final interesting part of this drive is since the other entrance was blocked by construction, the Google car had to turn around and exit through the entrance it used at the beginning. Central control apparently assigned what appears to be the vehicle watching the entrance originally, to lead you out and act as a commit unit, calling your direction of travel at the intersection:
This would normally create a problem, as now the entrance would be uncovered, but as you can see, control also directed an EV to the charging station located on the corner, where its cameras can watch the intersection and even broadcast video of the entrance to central control:
This all indicates the ballot courier in the video is in fact a target, and has his own surveillance assigned. Why is the mystery. I think most likely would be to prevent tampering, as the last thing our election riggers would want is some amateur hour rigging job done by comparative neophytes, which gets uncovered and rattles confidence in the elections. Those rigging our elections want to be the only ones rigging them, and have full control.
Less likely possibilities – they are simply watching where anyone might try to tamper with the elections to document it for their files, or even less likely I think, they intended to do something here themselves to steal ballots, or mark ballots, but the local parking lot surveillance guy fucked up their plans.
These pieces are becoming increasingly subtle. What they are dong now is exposing you to the nuances of surveillance, so you will absorb through osmosis the fact all of this is out there, and it will work to look this subtle.
Some may dislike that I am burning the surveillance like this, which I have noticed is now assigned to most government buildings. They might argue this would help any assault force looking to take the building violently.
Firstly, terrorism and mass casualty attacks are a meme. They do not occur, unless this massive American Stasi wants them to occur. You see how it is everywhere, and watches everything. I would wager you have not seen an attack it has not actively allowed. I suspect in most cases, it creates them as a way of justifying its own overbearing powers.
Second, I do not like hardened government buildings. I am an old-school Constitutionalist in the mold of the Founding Fathers. Just as the Second Amendment keeps the government from attacking the citizens, I think soft government buildings, in which the occupants are keenly aware that their ability to go home alive is solely due to the good will of the citizenry, keeps government polite, and eager to please.
I can see nothing the Founders would frown more upon, than government workers, aware that citizens would want to attack them and kill them, wasting taxpayer dollars to try and stop such attacks, when the taxpayer dollars should really be going to the rebels, so they might upgrade their equipment, and more efficiently install a government which is not wasting time trying to harden its facilities to fend off attacks by a citizenry so sick of their shit they want to kill everyone in the building – and are motivated enough to try.
Were I King for a day, I would fire all surveillance watching over government buildings, remove all armed security, eliminate all lockable doors, allow the citizenry to carry firearms freely in the buildings, and every worker pulling a government salary there would know, if things went down, it would be solely the good will of the citizenry they serve which would decide if they would live or die.
Plus obviously, I assume the surveillance I deal with regularly, which actually assaults me in my house with some weapon akin to the Havana Weapon, has some ties to the government.
So obviously on the scale of allies and enemies, I would be firmly supportive of any revolutionary over the government at this point, as I imagine there are few revolutionaries willing to kill the Idaho college girls, support the Long Island Serial Killer, or run overwatch and support for 9/11, all of which I think it is clear the American Stasi has had a hand in.
Sic Semper Tyrannus. May it come quickly.
